devjab

67 ms·

631.
by devjab 3y ago
Even in React we do a lot of programmatic “UI generation” for data structures, and mostly use react for the more “unique” things, which is arguably a big part of our Enterprise application. We do use shared components, but it’s also very ni
632.
by devjab 3y ago
You can set a lot of that up with the shared config in the .vscode folder, and then enforce it with whatever rule set you chose and however you chose. We do it with auto-save and the prettier engine for Typescript, the C# engine for C#, the
633.
by devjab 3y ago
Most of OpenAIs tech stack is AI toolage, but basically everything you interact with is written in Python. Nobody uses C# for anything serious, because why would you? It’s not a bad language, it’s just not a very good language either. Need
634.
by devjab 3y ago
I have ADHD, but unlike the author I was 30 before it was diagnosed, so I stayed my medication late and I was a rather well function adult at the time. What led to me getting the diagnosis was having children, which destroyed my “coping mec
635.
by devjab 3y ago
I worked with C# for a decade, and I think it’s never been better than it is now. I also think it’s a language that’s mostly meant to be sold by Microsoft in 2023 where it’s sort of outlived its usefulness compared to something like Go, or
636.
by devjab 3y ago
Have you used azure functions in an enterprise setting? Because it’s a terrible experience. I think our “best” issue is how sometimes our functions won’t be capable of connecting to their container registry. For no apparent reason. We have
637.
by devjab 3y ago
I think you make some decent points, but at the same time I really don’t understand this part: > For non-expert team members, modern C# is turning out to be way more intuitive than SQL the moment you encounter a 3+ table join scenario. P
638.
by devjab 3y ago
I really like Typescript, but this is a really weird thing to say in relation to building web-apps in a single language considering that is one of the primary reasons to pick Typescript as a language. It’s not the only reason, but if Python
639.
by devjab 3y ago
Not necessarily proud, but the only thing that plays on my mind when I have to deal with feet (and inches since those are called “thumbs” in my country) is that guy in Braveheart going “some men are longer than others”. It is what it is.
640.
by devjab 3y ago
The whole “feet” thing made it impossible to get any sort of scale/height thing right in my head, but it is hilarious that they mix the metric system into their crazy mess. I’m not sure the Brits would’ve done it though, I like climbin
641.
by devjab 3y ago
I don’t think I agree with the sentiment that user doesn’t equal business, to some degree maybe, but a business is what its users produce. I buy the point that some users within a business can have a demand for processes that will not be go
642.
by devjab 3y ago
Google only lost because they couldn’t re-adjust their business for their paid products to not be similar to their advertising products. I can only speak for the European enterprise scene, but AWS came first and in the beginning they went a
643.
by devjab 3y ago
I depends on what we mean when we say “serious work” but from an European enterprise perspective you would not use OpenAI for “serious work”, you would use Microsoft products. Co-pilot is already much more refined in terms of business value
644.
by devjab 3y ago
It’s unregulated capitalism at least, or perhaps capitalism regulated by the capitalists. We’re entering uncharted ground in terms of not only wealth distribution but also corporate ownership. We’ve never had a period in time where massive
645.
by devjab 3y ago
I don’t disagree that some of the CS education is fine. A lot of the algorithm/math curriculum is fine even though it’s very old. I’m talking more about the systems design, systems architecture and project management which is sorely o
646.
by devjab 3y ago
“The problem with many professors is that their previous occupation was student” This one is one of the more impactful on our industry in my opinion. I have a “side gig” as an external examiner, which means that every half year I get to sit
647.
by devjab 3y ago
C++ was always with us. You’re not wrong in anything you said. We spent a lot of time and effort to set up an opinionated TS ecosystem to avoid a lot to common issues, because it would be a nightmare to work with if you didn’t. You’re also
648.
by devjab 3y ago
I think a lot of your comments here are very true. I don’t think docker made my world worse and I certainly don’t think it cost me more time, but I also sort of agree with the author. I came into Typescript late, and to “tame” the wildness
649.
by devjab 3y ago
If Blazor turns out to be good, we may reconsider. Like I said, I’ve worked with C# for a decade and I’m not personally convinced Blazor will even exist as a non-abandoned option in a couple of years. To be fair, I’m more convinced post .Ne
650.
by devjab 3y ago
It’s not like Nuget hasn’t had its share of supplychain attacks. I don’t disagree with you, but we don’t use external packages unless we have too (as in React) and we vet every update. So in that sense there is really no security issues com
651.
by devjab 3y ago
Lunar went through a transition from Node/Typescript, to Java to Go and they seem to think it’s the “only” language worth building a back-end in. Which is obviously a wild statement, but having worked with C# and .Net as well as C++ fo
652.
by devjab 3y ago
I’m not really a fan of Python as such, but after a few decades in the industry, I’m beginning to think that being good at being bandaid is “better”. I can’t think of a single tech where we don’t have a bunch of duct tape (as we refer to i
653.
by devjab 3y ago
It seems a little disingenuous of you not to mention how I never hide the fact that it's an issue with the batteries. I'd also say that considering how great OData's patch is with the modelbuilder it's actually EF that&#
654.
by devjab 3y ago
I spent a decade with C# and .Net and even in its current form which is easily the best it’s ever been I vastly prefer to work with Typescript. Yes, you do need to set up some rather strong governance around it for it to work for multiple t
655.
by devjab 3y ago
In some areas the climate change is creating too much “wetland” which poses a different set of issues. We’ve had record amounts of rain here in Denmark, and the local farmers should probably look into farming rice, or maybe seaweed, if it c
656.
by devjab 3y ago
Did they break stuff? One of the differences is that Python is versioned, so you should be capable of running your current version without issues and then update when you’re ready. While JavaScript itself is backwards compatible, in a few c
657.
by devjab 3y ago
I think it’s a weird issue. On one hand the governments probably shouldn’t do this, on the other hand we had 1902 vehicles permanently confiscated by our government between 1. April 2001 and 20. March 2023 for our “Insane Driving” (vanvidsb
658.
by devjab 3y ago
I’m not sure I would pay for it for private projects over just using 3.5, but everything I said about its efficiency bonus is still true, so it’s probably largely down to you. I think it’s worth it, but not enough for me to buy it, at least
659.
by devjab 3y ago
Not spending your own money to buy tools that help you at work. I have the impression, and that could be totally wrong, that it would be far more “normal” for Americans do to so to get ahead.
660.
by devjab 3y ago
This is going to be a rather Scandinavian opinion, but it's worth it when your company pays for it. With the exception, that you need to be actually capable of using it for your work without sharing trade secrets or breaking the GDPR a

More ›