devin

13 ms·

151.
by devin 5mo ago
Big same. I have been doing a lot of clojure development, and hooking up my app to a live REPL has given me an absolutely fantastic feedback loop for the LLM. I don't think a lot of people understand what they're missing.
152.
by devin 5mo ago
That's what the 7 figure salaries are for.
153.
by devin 5mo ago
What is today right now in Australia? How about where you live? You have not thought enough about what you’re saying and are probably not aware of all the weird time issues we have in our world.
154.
by devin 6mo ago
or, maybe, it signals insufficient thought about the boundary conditions that should or shouldn't trigger test failures. doing random things to hopefully get a failure is fine if there's an actual purpose to it, but putting random
155.
by devin 6mo ago
Are you joking? This is the kind of thing that leads to flaky tests. I was always counseled against the use of randomness in my tests, unless we're talking generative testing like quickcheck.
156.
by devin 6mo ago
I'm not really sure what point you're making. Is the point that it is harder to to secure more things? Is it that security events happen more frequently the higher your number of employees goes? If so, I bristle at this way that m
157.
by devin 6mo ago
Not a party to the conflict? Are you joking? Don’t focus on what the US says. Focus on what it does.
158.
by devin 6mo ago
Could you explain parallel branches vs what git offers today? If it's to enable multi-agent scenarios, don't worktrees (at least in the local sense) allow for this?
159.
by devin 6mo ago
One of the authors, John Hughes did a talk on property-based testing at Clojure West some number of years back. Worth a watch if you're interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi0rHwfiX1Q
160.
by devin 6mo ago
Nitpicking: Once articles which are _obviously_ AI-written stop, the comments calling it out will (should) stop. It is far more likely that AI-written articles will become harder to spot, not that they will stop being written.
161.
by devin 6mo ago
Funny you should mention that. I just used a two sentence prompt to do something straightforward. It took careful human consideration and 3 rounds of "two sentence" prompts to arrive at the _correct_ transformation. I think you&#x
162.
by devin 6mo ago
Benn is the best. His most recent video is about Ring cameras.
163.
by devin 6mo ago
Yes, both. A good example why is for example, as muscle memory grows it will bias your note selection when improvising. Sometimes you really need to slow down to consciously force yourself to explore other sounds. Once you've done that
164.
by devin 6mo ago
You're going to get both . Lucky you!
165.
by devin 6mo ago
I do both 1 and 2, because 1 is frequently served by some attention to 2 at times. This notion that it’s one or the other is unserious.
166.
by devin 6mo ago
Good way of putting it, yeah. Do I think it's likely? No. Would I willingly allow for such a scenario to even be possible? Also no.
167.
by devin 6mo ago
That has been my comment to folks I know running these OpenClaw agents on Mac Minis. Some of them are very competent generally and are the type of people who I think historically would have told you why you shouldn't just `curl` and ru
168.
by devin 6mo ago
What an incredibly misinformed comment. You need to educate yourself. What you wrote is downright anti-American.
169.
by devin 7mo ago
Absolutely agree. I'm watching a team which is producing insane amounts of code for their team size, but the level of thought that has gone into all of the details that would make their product a fit predator to run at scale and solve
170.
by devin 7mo ago
Nah, it's there in the history, but they're co-authors so I think they may be showing up differently/not at all. If you just hunt the history you can find all of the co-authored entries. I think what I saw was 3-5 distinct us
171.
by devin 7mo ago
So you were just mocking the format of my post because it's reminiscent of AI-generated text? What I wrote was perfectly clear and in no way AI-generated.
172.
by devin 7mo ago
Who are you referring to? Claude? I don't understand what you're trying to say.
173.
by devin 7mo ago
Claude's contribution is 2 commits adding 4500 lines and removing 0. I don't think people understand what this repo even is. Claude's contribution is not significant any way you slice it. Go look at the other users who are co
174.
by devin 7mo ago
That isn’t what this says at all.
175.
by devin 7mo ago
haha, if you knew me you would realize that I am exactly the wrong person to be asking that specific question.
176.
by devin 7mo ago
What is your understanding of the luddite movement? I ask because I don't believe many are aware that luddites were not anti-technology. It was a labor movement which was targeted at exploitation by factory owners. Their issue was with
177.
by devin 7mo ago
I appreciate you actually taking a moment to think through the cost, but I think we could start with some pragmatism and look to run wires to people who are within a reasonable range of existing systems, of which there are many. Clearly not
178.
by devin 7mo ago
Yes, it does mean tax money. Stop corporate welfare and bump the corporate tax rate back to a reasonable value.
179.
by devin 7mo ago
Buddy, many of the people who are being served by Starlink are by no means "very" rural at all. If you get into "lives in a shack in the mountains", then sure I agree, but a HUGE number of people are barely outside of an
180.
by devin 7mo ago
I've written it elsewhere, but: it is such a shame that the United States saw fit to run electricity _everywhere_, no matter how rural your location, but instead of do the same for rural internet we had to wait for... a private company

More ›