2 ms·
or, maybe, it signals insufficient thought about the boundary conditions that should or shouldn't trigger test failures. doing random things to hopefully get a
by devin 6mo ago
or, maybe, it signals insufficient thought about the boundary conditions that should or shouldn't trigger test failures.
doing random things to hopefully get a failure is fine if there's an actual purpose to it, but putting random values all over the place in the hopes it reveals a problem in your CI pipeline or something seems like a real weak reason to do it.
- tomjakubowski 6mo agoI don't think anyone is advocating for random application of randomness.