Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
demibabs
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
demibabs
5d ago
The article wasn’t written by Tao.
2.
▲
by
demibabs
5d ago
I like how FT makes me accept cookies from their 46 “technology” (advertising) partners before showing me that the article is behind a paywall anyway.
3.
▲
by
demibabs
5d ago
I feel like having any existing context absolutely poisons the ability to go in a different direction. I’m not sure if there’s a good way to fix this.
4.
▲
by
demibabs
9d ago
Damn, we’re even having Claude write important press releases now
5.
▲
by
demibabs
10d ago
> or via software-level jailbreak of the device. I’m surprised that even Apple calls jailbreaking, jailbreaking. Doesn’t that imply their own software is a jail?
6.
▲
by
demibabs
12d ago
Even tech giants are putting out articles seemingly fully written by Claude.
7.
▲
by
demibabs
12d ago
Off-topic but the banner picture for this article is really cute.
8.
▲
by
demibabs
12d ago
Some battles are won at the domain registry.
9.
▲
by
demibabs
12d ago
What happens if there are no more humans in the loop, and instead of building on human work, models have to build on their own work? Would we get stuck in a local maxima? When AI labs talk about “long-horizon tasks”, they mean tasks on the
10.
▲
by
demibabs
13d ago
Yet if you overestimated the mileage you would’ve been none the wiser!
11.
▲
by
demibabs
13d ago
As much as I dislike flock, this only seems like an indictment on the police.
12.
▲
by
demibabs
13d ago
> TLDR: AI is really good at detecting deceptive adverts - why isn’t Google using it? I have the same question regarding “why is Workday’s resume parser so shit?”
13.
▲
by
demibabs
13d ago
You can clearly see the side effects of the models being trained on Reddit content.
14.
▲
by
demibabs
13d ago
I’m not the biggest fan of Ed Zitron, but something he said that stuck with me is: OpenAI and Anthropic spend much time warning us about “what if powerful AIs got into the wrong hands?” But it’s already in the wrong hands.
15.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
> Each task comes from a private production codebase that we licensed from a real-world company How does that work?
16.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
Doesn’t it ultimately have to be this way, to prevent saturation?
17.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
Can you elaborate?
18.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
> the reasons are so they can track who you are and sell your profile advertising. What? Like they weren’t doing this before? Obviously Google’s telemetry is tracking every link you click regardless; there’s no extra tracking benefit to
19.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
JavaScript is required to use Google search at all, no?
20.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
I think it would be depressing in its own way if this technology just ended up being regulated out of existence.
21.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
But what’s stopping Google from doing this already?
22.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
Can someone explain why this matters? Not being flippant I just don’t understand why this would be important.
23.
▲
by
demibabs
14d ago
> Generation scales with spend, review does not, and that asymmetry is the whole design problem. I see you guys have a blog post factory as well.
24.
▲
by
demibabs
15d ago
They already told the NYT that they’ve made “substantial progress” on another one of the MP Problems (most likely the Hodge Conjecture). That said, that’s probably just because of the drama miring their most recent one. After 2 I don’t see
25.
▲
by
demibabs
15d ago
> I am proud to be among the list of 25 initial signatories — all Fields Medallists — to the declaration below I wonder if there’s a Fields Medalist group chat.
26.
▲
by
demibabs
15d ago
Thanks, I was wondering why they would be using Salesforce in the cockpit
27.
▲
by
demibabs
15d ago
I still don’t understand what a “software factory” is. Can someone clue me in?
28.
▲
by
demibabs
15d ago
Good article
29.
▲
by
demibabs
15d ago
"It's just" is usually an annoying way to start a comment.
30.
▲
by
demibabs
16d ago
I’m well aware of the dispute, and OpenAI’s conduct has definitely been less than respectable. But when the central claim of the argument (that OpenAI and the researchers solved the same problem) is completely false, it’s hard to take the a
More ›