deltaonefour

15 ms·

61.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
So you'd rather use the example in the article that's 5x longer? Makes no sense.
62.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
It's written in psuedo code. And what error.
63.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
If you can't read my example I am sorry to tell you, you don't have the necessary skill set to work as a programmer. What I wrote is much simpler then ANYTHING in the article. If you can read the article you can read my code. If y
64.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
You are getting side tracked. Implementation details have nothing to do with it. It's about state and functions. He is saying rather then have an entity manage both state and functions, Just have a function take in state. The implement
65.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>Schroedinger's streaming service just died It's both alive and dead at the same time. Like the cat.
66.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
It crashed and burned.
67.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Pairs nicely? You realize what happened to the Hindenburg when they paired hydrogen and oxygen together?
68.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Those names sound stupid. You need a name that gives no hint about the mundane task the framework/startup/programming language does but sounds elitist and pretentious. The periodic table of elements and Greek and Roman gods provid
69.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
This makes sense. So basically if you style your programming such that a list is never materialized you can achieve zero allocation based programming. However for things like "sorting" this can never fully be achieved. You cannot
70.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>My purpose in this blog post is to outline another argument against the idea that consciousness can be reduced to computation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Brain_Project Started in 2005 the goal of the blue b
71.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Good article. But it's on GPT-3. Nobody is claiming GPT-3 is sentient. The claim was made on Googles lamda. I read your entire article. Now please read the interview with lamda that I sent. It is thorough beyond what was used to probe
72.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
It's discuss-able. Because it's not opinion. You can draw upon actual recorded events as evidence. This can go beyond anecdote (which still has a level of validity) and even into statistics if we dig deep enough. The trouble with
73.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>It depends on whether the estimation comes from pretension, or comes from actual understanding of what these bots are doing. It comes from pretension. Because you can't just understand what these bots are doing. You also have to un
74.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
I bet even if a researcher truly created an AGI, there'd be tons of threads like this claiming that it's just a language generator.
75.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Analogies aren't proof for anything. I'm pretty sure though, we obviously can't prove these chatbots are sentient. Clearly. However, for the first time, we ALSO cannot prove that these chatbots aren't sentient. The stati
76.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
There is a point here that even the twitter poster is missing. This machine is imitating a human better than a human itself, and we now have statistics to prove it. The question is... if statistically it's better at appearing human th
77.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>Would you describe your inner circle of friends as "quite awful"? I really hope you wouldn't. I would describe all humans including myself, my circle of friends and everyone I met to have an immense awful side that they c
78.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
I never linked religion and morality. Morality wasn't even a topic that was covered. It's just you and your bias. >Science and religion are both about our "best guesses". No. One is a better guess then the other. Scie
79.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Yeah this is true. But also the employer publicly firing those who sent the letter without some form of discussion also looks really really bad. People have an expectation of a CEO to have a really "mature" and controlled temperam
80.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
This is actually bad investment strategy. Warren Buffet once made a shit load of money because of this. During a more conservative time... waaay back. A company was doing very well but the CEO had an affair. The public caught wind of the af
81.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Eh he comes off as a normal human being to me. Definitely quite awful, but that's also very normal. The difference between Elon and others is that Elon doesn't put on as big of a facade. There are CEO's who are psychopaths an
82.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Haskell does this. Basically languages that are following the ML style have this syntax including Haskell. You must not have experience with this family of languages at it is very common and a huge part of functional programming. A good num
83.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Functional is always at odds with low level programming because of heap allocation. You can't control it because of immutability. Just a simple map operation does a heap allocation. How does Ante avoid this problem and give the user co
84.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Type checking is a form of proof. It proves your system is type safe. You would need billions or trillions of tests to achieve type safety equivalent to a type checker. A successful test only proves something for a single test case. In fact
85.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Yes but things can break less with a robust type system. This is categorically true. For example ELM is a programming language that cannot crash due to it's type system. I mean it can crash off of exceeding system resources or through
86.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>It's only indistinguishable to an outsider, because one side of the conversation has practiced puppeting the other and is looking for confirmation instead of probing for flaws. Possible. But you would have to prove this because the
87.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>I took one (1) college philosophy course. One course is enough to generate bias. You actually studied the stuff to get an A. There's no avoiding indoctrination when you work that hard on it to get that high of a grade. If you got a
88.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
Do I need to become a Scientologist to know it's shit? No. Do I need to go to university to learn computer science? No. There is PLENTY of information about philosophy on the internet. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org&#x2F
89.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
The use to pirate stuff all the time. Now it's actually more convenient for me to buy it. But the philosophy I always had was that as long as there were enough people like you paying for software, I wouldn't have to.
90.
by deltaonefour 4y ago
>All that is proven by this statement is that you're quite full of yourself. lol That's a long response. I was going to take the time to read it and respond. But once I read this garbage sentence I decided that I'm not goi

More ›