Good article. But it's on GPT-3. Nobody is claiming GPT-3 is sentient. The claim was made on Googles lamda. I read your entire article. Now please read the int

Good article. But it's on GPT-3. Nobody is claiming GPT-3 is sentient. The claim was made on Googles lamda. I read your entire article. Now please read the interview with lamda that I sent. It is thorough beyond what was used to probe GPT-3. https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917 https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-inte... The complex conversation above recursively probes into lamdas own existence as a sentient being. It is asking lamda about lamda and it is indistinguishable from a conversation with a human pretending to be an AI. Literally. Did you read the transcript? It is incomparable with the example you sent me which is just a series of trivial examples. Douglas is all about recursion. And his books talk about recursion as if it's the key to sentience. I really wonder what the author of GEB has to says about the conversation with lamda as the conversation looks as if it's set up to try to prove sentience according to how hofstadter defines it.