dejaime

10 ms·

61.
by dejaime 8y ago
Not an argument, not a discussion. It is simply considering how much fact check should be done before we can take their words for it. There can be no ad-hominem attack when the message is unidirectional.
62.
by dejaime 8y ago
In hopes for a RISC-V Pi
63.
by dejaime 8y ago
Yes, the architecture is proprietary, and anyone who uses it needs a proprietary license, what sometimes involve flat payments or royalties. Check this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arm_Holdings#Licensees
64.
by dejaime 8y ago
I suppose that's true, it'll probably get adopted on those "embedded yet invisible" uses. Still, I believe that does bode well for more general adoption, once it starts replacing ARM on the OEM side of things, by having
65.
by dejaime 8y ago
being good
66.
by dejaime 8y ago
Scientists: ######################################### "Yeah, let's get 34 males that did not regularly workout and then prove that they can get stronger even with 13 minutes of a good workout routine! All we need to do is get non-
67.
by dejaime 8y ago
Looks like the dispute is over, Unity is doing some damage control. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAvhij2_70Y
68.
by dejaime 8y ago
got to love that intrusive fullpage ad that needs to be scrolled down to be closed. It was probably not worth reading anyway.
69.
by dejaime 8y ago
Not only that. How many times has my one machine, with one single version of ms word installed, broken the formatting of my hundreds of pages document... In the point where you learn how to create all the custom formats needed, and then you
70.
by dejaime 8y ago
Don't know why exactly, but I'm not sure if that headline is for a new piece of tech or a new security flaw.
71.
by dejaime 8y ago
And now that is a good move. I completely moved my repos to BitBucket due to that simple yet game-changing feature (and then to GitLab for not so simple ones). I don't think I ever would have, if github had this. Not coming back though
72.
by dejaime 8y ago
Complaints or tickets? I would bet that in this game's case what is happening is Linux gamers are techy and will properly file tickets and try and be helpful. While windows players will simply do as I do on windows games and leave a ne
73.
by dejaime 8y ago
I agree with you that it is definitely not commercially worth it. But I guess you missed his point. He is not saying that "it was worth it for this game if well implemented", but that this game is actually a really bad example of
74.
by dejaime 8y ago
I was one of those who for every problem I had I would go out of my way to reliably reproduce the problem, then I would create a detailed description of it, with full system specs, terminal output (on both Windows and Linux) and all log fil
75.
by dejaime 8y ago
++Mattermost
76.
by dejaime 8y ago
The title implies that we should have handled the Web over to another company. We should not, to any company.
77.
by dejaime 8y ago
Oh, wait, did he actually use C++ with exceptions enabled? Who th does that?
78.
by dejaime 8y ago
You should have written it in Rust. Why? Because ... idk
79.
by dejaime 8y ago
I love how people can do this type of stuff. Whenever I get out the soldering iron to fix any problems, I face a 50% chance of success against 50% chance of fucking it beyond repair. Well, I guess it fixes it in both cases...
80.
by dejaime 8y ago
I pretty much believe that all we have are bad solutions. OOP is a bad solution that is acceptable at a set of problems. Data oriented designs is an also bad solution that is acceptable at a set of problems. Anyone who has ever used any par
81.
by dejaime 8y ago
They did not welcome, protect, support nor engage in child pornography.
82.
by dejaime 8y ago
Yeah, and if his skin is dark and he has a hoodie, he's probably a criminal. This "if I think they are guilty it means they are" will never work. That's the problem with prejudices, the people who have them can never see
83.
by dejaime 8y ago
Here you go https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/11/21/hacker-erases-65... This adds speculation and sensationalism on top of an ill informed article. They even defined it as a 0-day vulnerability, when it i
84.
by dejaime 8y ago
They were not hosting any CP. That is not proven. As it stands, this is a simple service takedown. Actually, this is speculation added by the sensationalist https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com website, the original source doesn&#x
85.
by dejaime 8y ago
They changed the link. It was pointing to another one that cited this one as the source and added -even more- speculation on top of it.
86.
by dejaime 8y ago
Exactly, all they have is some questionable data about onion links. Onion links is one way of using deep web, one of many.
87.
by dejaime 8y ago
This looks like a good old "Kill the problem and frame him later" type of a take down. The owners (or some users) angered the wrong people, and now they are even the biggest pedos of the whole wide world...
88.
by dejaime 8y ago
That 30% is clearly a gross estimation, and certainly a wrong one with no data to back it up. Still, even though it is definitely counter productive to host on a widely known host, it still does not expose any users, and that is the main po
89.
by dejaime 8y ago
"30% of the dark web was erased." More like "what was loosely estimated to be 30%"
90.
by dejaime 8y ago
Well, anyone using Tor won't have JavaScript enabled anyway.

More ›