decidu0us9034

6 ms·

1.
by decidu0us9034 15d ago
but they're very huge markdown files. look how much junk they're polluting the conext window with.
2.
by decidu0us9034 2mo ago
"Those people" who? Homebuilders? You're saying you think the cost of homebuilding should be much higher? When I listen to some of you guys it's not hard for me to see why these DCs are so unpopular
3.
by decidu0us9034 4mo ago
I love how the original post says this happens across vastly different societies regardless of all these different variables people are offering as possible explanations. For example, in India (which this article is about), women have a m
4.
by decidu0us9034 4mo ago
This also sounds like rich people problems. Vast majority of people with a W-2 take the standard deduction.
5.
by decidu0us9034 4mo ago
The upper decile of income earners account for more than half of all consumption in the US. Household balance sheets and wealth have never looked stronger, again when you account for all the appreciated stocks and properties owned by the up
6.
by decidu0us9034 5mo ago
Maybe for some subset of sotware (like CRM panels or something) PMs will do everything. But if you're projecting the way one sort of software (ie user-facing, business use oriented software) is developed and put to use with software wr
7.
by decidu0us9034 5mo ago
It sounds like they will still need to hire and train human talent who can understand the code, and evaluate and integrate outputs of AI systems that conform to the specific compliance and data retention requirements of these industries. An
8.
by decidu0us9034 6mo ago
I think a big part of the reason AI is so divisive and only declining in popularity, is because much of the discourse is shaped by mid to senior career SWEs who fantasize about putting everyone who's not a mid to senior career SWE out
9.
by decidu0us9034 6mo ago
Right now, we accept false positives as long as you can sort them out. I think it's pretty typical that >99% of fuzzer runs don't result in new coverage. Of course they're far from useless without feedback but it's be
10.
by decidu0us9034 6mo ago
In a large codebase there will still be bugs in how these components interoperate with each other, bugs involving complex chaining of api logic or a temporal element. These are the kind of bugs fuzzers generally struggle at finding. I would
11.
by decidu0us9034 6mo ago
I think there is already papers and presentations on integrating these kind of iterative code understanding/verificaiton loops in harnesses. There may be some advantages over fuzzing alone. But I think the cost-benefit analysis is a lo
12.
by decidu0us9034 6mo ago
I could see that being an incremental time save (perhaps not worth the token spend except for the dev team, not a high-value bug). But nbody finds this kind of bug "by hand" and hasn't for a long time now. Do people here real
13.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
Analysis of what? What does that mean? What's something you conceivably would need a consulting firm to "analyze?" I don't understand why management consulting firms would hire software people in the first place, and the
14.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
Well it's an operating system. Ideally safety and reliability are prioritized. I think the scope and complexity of an operating system are large enough both to make a lot of changes non-trivial and to trip up LLMs. I think it's fi
15.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
It's an operating system, not a website.
16.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
The law defines an operating system provider as "a person or entity that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system software on a computer, mobile device, or any other general computing device ." If the intent were to t
17.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
Well the problem is, there is no consensus standard. The onus is on every individual vendor to figure out how to comply. And it's so poorly written that there is no clear path to compliance. Even attempting to comply is burdensome an
18.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
It's not privacy-respecting at all to create some side channel between your browser and OS to transmit some information about a "user profile." If this were about browser vendors it might make sense but they're targeting
19.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
I'm not sure it's worth entertaining these hypotheticals. Just another absurd CA law that's impossible to comply with. "When you set up your account and it asks for your birthdate." What does this mean? "Setup&
20.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
All the docs are already in its training data, wouldn't that just pollute the context? I think giving a model better/non-free tooling would help as mentioned. binja code mode can be useful but you definitely need to give these mod
21.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
Sure. They're making a strong claim, but I think they mean "author of the Fascist Manifesto" as shorthand to say Marinetti was an ardent supporter of fascism and Mussolini. His support continued throughout the 30's and 4
22.
by decidu0us9034 7mo ago
People use whatever tools are the most effective and they have plenty of incentive not to talk publicly about them. I think the era of openness has passed us by. But why does stature matter anyway? If I look at chromium or MSRC bug reports,
23.
by decidu0us9034 8mo ago
The first is certainly interesting, but it won't help you develop 0day. I would think of it like more of a collection of fun puzzles and esoterica. For example all the heap unliking/metadata attacks and House of X stuff is pretty
24.
by decidu0us9034 8mo ago
I was wondering why so many people were suddenly hopping into my humble profession and declaring me redundant. Ah, a youtube influencer is at the center of it. Makes sense.
25.
by decidu0us9034 8mo ago
"Claude struggles with large functions and more or less gives up immediately on those exceeding 1,000 instructions." Well, yeah, that's the thing, an n64 game, that's C targetting an architecture where compiler optimizat
26.
by decidu0us9034 8mo ago
Yeah I'm not sure I understand what the goal here is. Ship of Harkinian is a rewrite not just a decompilation. As a human reverse engineer I've gotten a lot of false positives.This seems like one of those areas where hallucination
27.
by decidu0us9034 8mo ago
I'm not sure you can call something an optimizing C compiler if it doesn't optimize or enforce C semantics (well, it compiles C but also a lot of things that aren't syntactically valid C). It seemed to generate a lot of code