Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dddbbb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Apple is the biggest company in the world by a pretty significant margin[0]. The clout they wield is absolutely insane and they could kill many things if they were so inclined. [0] -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_
2.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
'Verified' ticks in general are so bizarrely mismanaged. See also Twitter removing the status of controversial political figures. I feel like they should be totally open access to anyone who can provide irrefutable proof of identi
3.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Maybe it's different in other countries (I am in the UK), but I feel as if there isn't enough content for a recommender system to even be useful. I feel like after browsing through the catalogue a few times, I have a rough idea of
4.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I would nominally agree with this logic, but surely the exact same applies when voting? Should people not bother voting because they are just one in a sea of many?
5.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Buying the cheapest Casio can also be a status signal, similar to the CEO of Goldman Sachs wearing a Swatch. Buying a truly cheap watch is a signal of 'I don't care' (which may be true, or may be affected), whereas getting in
6.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
To ask a very amateur question, why do people think Bitcoin specifically will succeed? Aren't there dozens of coins out there which have fixed some of it's most glaring flaws?
7.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
> This shouldn't be so controversial, given that they work for us, Pretty suspect line of reasoning when you apply it to literally any other scenario.
8.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
They didn't set out to explicitly prove 1+1=2, they just got around to it after 2 volumes, it didn't require 2 volumes of background. A direct proof of 1+1=2 is pretty short in most logical systems.
9.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Great talk. The definition of observational equivalence is very elegant. I instantly thought it made no sense or must be a partial definition, then the simple example given on the next slide explained it perfectly.
10.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
For many roles at a hedge fund, being able to do mathematics quickly and intuitively is a valuable skill. Not sure why an economist applying for an MD job would need to be tested on that, though.
11.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
It seems to me like Lean has a lot of the momentum at the moment. It's clear that other projects like Coq suffer from a lack of traditional mathematicians formalising modern, fashionable topics. Kevin Buzzard's implementation in L
12.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
The author of the Metamath Zero paper is actually one of the most active contributors to the project described in the article[0]. [0]: https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib_stats.html
13.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Increased assurance that the proof is correct and the various standard benefits of digital over analogue data. This software automatically checks the validity of the proof (with a very small, manually verified core of code doing so), it doe
14.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Totality is optional in Idris. Also, the big dependently-typed languages like Coq, Agda, Idris all support corecursion, so they can run programs infinitely provided the program does something productive.
15.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I'm not sure what Turing completeness has to do with such a problem. There's a theoretical non-Turing complete subset of HTML+JS that has all the problems you claim, meanwhile Markdown with a built-in lambda calculus interpreter i
16.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I'd say there is quite an important conceptual difference in that the state monad example exactly desugars to pure functional code. Monads give us a good syntax for sequential computation, but this sequentiality is built out of purely
17.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I've seen TAoCP (The Art of Computer Programming) and TaPL (Types and Programming Languages) used before, and both are definitely great.
18.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I was just responding to the parent comment's claim that Haskell's sum types are not true sum types.
19.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I find it strange that the Facebook employee wouldn't just forcibly change OP's username to something else (e.g. @danny123) then give the desired name to their friend. Actually stealing someone's account seems like an over th
20.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Haskell's Either is a 'true' sum type, it corresponds exactly to the way sums have been defined in the literature for decades, and also is the Curry-Howard representation of logical or. It necessarily must be inside a Either-
21.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
The problem is also that in order to generically define functors, one needs higher-kinded types. The Haskell/Scala code on the Wikipedia page is not translatable to say, Java.
22.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Doesn't that put off a lot of very high-quality candidates though? If someone joins because they want to work in an interesting machine learning team, they probably don't want to be potentially moved on to a legacy Java CRUD app.
23.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
That model Macbook is 4-8 years old. This is a pretty useless and condescending comment.
24.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
He's still relatively young, and likely realises the near absolute power he holds over one of the largest companies in the world is not something he can get back once he gives it up. Also Gates, to put it in very uncharitable terms, ha
25.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
Intended according to whom?
26.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I noticed that in the screenshots section[1], the Linux screenshots for the Netsurf site and Wikipedia are from this year, but the BBC one is from 2011. How does the current BBC site fare? [1] -- https://www.netsurf-browser.org&#
27.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
It's still there as far as I can see, it's in an image[0]. I believe their intention is to show a kind of pseudo-desugaring of what the IO monad actually does internally. [0] -- https://pitayan.com/assets/stat
28.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
There's a woman living in Japan who was born before George Orwell. It's incredible to think that one could be in their 60s and still have half a century left.
29.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
I still very much doubt they actually destroy the data though. They could easily be keeping everything and then once the ransomware stops paying as well, they'll start profiting from what they've stolen.
30.
▲
by
dddbbb
6y ago
That's still coming via the API. They may be blocking any large chunks of text from being reproduced, rather than individual characters (which would be harder to police).
More ›