Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dbt00
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
451.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
Also credit card purchase records.
452.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
You know what the best way is to make sure that happens? Equate the two for so long that when the gun control lobby eventually wins people fail to give credit to your arguments. My personal opinion -- the current constitutional regime is a
453.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
Coming back to this, I was wrong about the details of Arizona law. They require pedestrians to yield to drivers outside of crosswalks, marked or unmarked. https://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/00793.htm However, I still th
454.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
Coming back to this, I was wrong about the details of Arizona law. They require pedestrians to yield to drivers outside of crosswalks, marked or unmarked. https://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/00793.htm However, I still th
455.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
In Arizona it is the driver's responsibility to yield to all pedestrians on the same side of the road. She somehow crossed 3 and a half lanes of traffic without the Uber SDV ever perceiving her. Their fault.
456.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
I wonder if Uber will have the capital or credit to roll into acquiring a fleet of self-driving cars by the time the tech is even ready. Remember, they don't have any fixed transit assets now -- their driver contractors are all on the
457.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
And Silvercar was funded by and now acquired by Audi.
458.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
The car was not in the right place, or it would not have hit her. In the state of Arizona a pedestrian has right of way in front of any vehicle, and the driver must yield to any pedestrian on the same side of the road. Edited to add: We don
459.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
It would help if you actually state the country in question, so we can properly judge your statement's applicability. In the USA laws vary by state -- in California it is typically almost always incumbent on the driver to avoid pedestr
460.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
Point taken. He was once taken in by a popular hoax and wrote a post on his wired blog about it, after which he apologized on twitter. https://twitter.com/attackerman/status/311868261945978881 To remind everyone w
461.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
This has been answered ad nauseam. The Obama app was clearly a political campaign app They did not use fake quizzes to steal user data they asked supporters to contact their friends explicitly they did not download friend of frien
462.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
No credible evidence of either of those theories have ever been put forward. Meanwhile we have George Papadopoulos pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about his involvement in a Trump-Russia conspiracy. If anything this whole event should p
463.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
Spencer Ackerman is a stellar reporter with over 15 years experience writing for TNR, Wired, and The Guardian. He's gotten a huge of scoops on the national security beat throughout the years and none of his reporting has ever been call
464.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
> They got them on rather routine political corruption charges, which you can probably get half of DC for This is false. How many members of Clinton and Bush's campaign staff or senior national security staff were ever accused of co
465.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
I don't understand why people keep falling for this whataboutism. They're not comparable uses of the facebook API at all.
466.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
I've come around to the idea that role playing racism/sexism in gaming is just a dodge. It's the "just a prank bro"/"can't you take a joke?" of online shitlording. And the vast majority of the st
467.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
Here's the thing. How much that toxic shit bothers you is a function of multiple things, but ultimately it's a bell curve. Some people are going to fall to the far left and think it's great, some people are going to fall to t
468.
▲
by
dbt00
9y ago
physics PhD, then wall street HFT.
469.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
Nope. Pretty much any nonpublic silicon valley companies aren't -- some public ones too. They are spending more money then they have, in the short term, in order to become bigger and more successful in the long term. That's why th
470.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
I worked there for 7+ years, I'm not a bad person, and I don't feel bad. If you're opposed to a surveillance state, you should care deeply about preventing future terrorist attacks. I was someone who spent a lot of time think
471.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
I was a CS dropout who didn't work anywhere near SV when I was hired. The filter (and recruiting pipeline, given the proximity and deep connections to Stanford) tends to correlate with "top CS schools", but I promise you that
472.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
I worked at Palantir for over 7 years, and that doesn't sound like any of the projects I knew about or any of the people that I worked with.
473.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
Hey, not everybody there was baby faced. Your lead when you quit was 35. :)
474.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
I'm in kind of an odd position, because I worked there for many years with no CS degree at all and I was a lot older than most (not all). They do hire people who are great at CS things, and that often translates into mostly people from
475.
▲
by
dbt00
10y ago
Clearly some jobs at the org require security clearances, but most don't, and access to career growth isn't gated on that at all. Look up the forbes article from 2013 about the CEO Alex Karp (can't link easily due to adblocke
476.
▲
by
dbt00
11y ago
This is mostly good advice -- it's worth knowing both worst case and amortized average time -- but plenty of interviewers will filter you if you're being an aggressive asshole, even if you're right about facts. Make sure you&
477.
▲
by
dbt00
11y ago
I just accepted a position at Asana, and I don't have a CS degree. Are you sure you're correctly attributing your non-offer here? (Note I don't call it a failure. Hiring is a weighted RNG -- false negatives are common.)