Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dalyons
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
391.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
Personally I don’t carry my GC, because I’m far more likely to lose it than for anyone to ever ask for it. And it’s kind of a nightmare to replace, takes awhile and you can’t travel. To put it another way, the $100 fine is less expensive to
392.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
not nothing. https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/46... "people are now putting up a gigawatt’s worth of solar panels, the rough equivalent of the power generated by one coal-fired plant
393.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
> I'd like to 100x our energy supply I kind of see where you're coming from now. However, I don't particularly care about 100x'ing our future at the moment. For right now, I care about solving the existential risk of
394.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
Hrm? Heat pumps are multiples more efficient than gas.
395.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
probably. I think the US aggregators force the hotels to not undercut them, via contract. probably a different setup elsewhere.
396.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
in $/kwh. We are in fact doing things soley because of cost, and pretty much only because of cost, because capitalisim. Solar and wind are now cheaper than all alternatives in most situations, so they are rapidly becoming all thats bei
397.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
where do you follow him? i just poked around in X & youtube but all his stuff there seems ~a year old.
398.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
why? much more expensive, much slower. This reflexive "nukes are the only way" meme amongst technical folk really has gotta die.
399.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
you're just wrong. they already are cheap enough, its already happening. PV+battery is now cheaper than new gas & coal. Very soon to come, existing gas.
400.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
you may feel that, but its not going to happen. nukes are too expensive, and thus the energy they produce is too expensive.
401.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
solar + storage for a full day cycle is now cheaper than new gas. And way cheaper than nuclear. Keep up! https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/solar-electricity-e...
402.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
untrue. Solar + 24hr storage is now (just) cheaper than new gas. https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/solar-electricity-e...
403.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
in what, another decade or more before they actually get made at scale? they'll be irrelevant by then outside of niche applications.
404.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
why does that matter anymore? they are cheaper now without incentives, so whether they were subsidized in the past doesnt really matter right?
405.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
they're building that coal in the role of gas peaker plants - backup power. It will probably never be used at any significant % of capacity, as the solar and battery revolution continues to astound in its speed.
406.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
This is a common online trope, but has almost never been true for me when I’ve checked. (US domestic ~4 star hotels) Direct is more or at least equal to the aggregator prices.
407.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
The weird technicality of the clear unambiguous text of the 14th amendment?
408.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
Are the courts overstepping or is he just issuing blatantly illegal orders?
409.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
Honestly I think it’s neither, it’s just stupidity, incompetence and spite.
410.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
Acoustic coding
411.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
So short sighted and self destructive. The US is actively sabotaging its future in innovation, manufacturing and energy. For what? To make its car industry even less competitive? The world is moving on with or without the US, as you say.
412.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
In my experience on the hiring side, expiration dates exist mostly to prevent candidates stacking offers.
413.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
1987 is not a valid comparison for many reasons. Pick modern premium sedans (eg bmw) as a comparison and you’ll see it isn’t that different.
414.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
yeah i realized as i wrote that out that my personal conclusions probably don't apply in a monoservice type architecture. If you have a mono(or few) service architecture with a single (or few) db, it is actually feasible to have integr
415.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
You are of course entitled to your opinion, and I do appreciate going against the grain, but having worked in an “hours” environment and a “minutes” environment I couldn’t disagree more. The minutes job is so much more pleasant to work with
416.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
Huh? How is 2.7 the fastest ? There have been tons and tons of major performance gains since then, even without getting into yjit
417.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
You know why. It has nothing to do with Israel, that’s just a convenient test cause to start the illegal overreach. Other target populations are next, and soon enough anyone that objects to the regime.
418.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
certainly Andreessen has gone on many public rants about how he thinks dei and other "woke" initiatives are killing american tech innovation. Here's one interview - https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/1
419.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
A very small % of the global population lives in those conditions. We can thus safely ignore it as an edge case for now, and still solve for the vast majority of emissions reduction
420.
▲
by
dalyons
1y ago
to add, given the governing structure in china, the coal plants don't have to make economic sense. one-party politics would thus prefer to overbuild as a hedge against the population getting mad at them.
More ›