Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dalyons
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dalyons
5d ago
so what if theyre made in china?
2.
▲
by
dalyons
5d ago
coal usage has declined there the last two years. Would have declined even more this year, except for a certain very smart war.
3.
▲
by
dalyons
8d ago
physical 2fa should be an option, but i can never agree that we should force billions of regular people to use a harder to use and more inconvenient system that they have already indicated they dont want to use, for some mild security benef
4.
▲
by
dalyons
8d ago
It’s because we have effective biometrics now, so the need to carry around an inconvenient limiting physical 2nd factor is obsolete (for the vast majority of regular use cases)
5.
▲
by
dalyons
11d ago
The r2 is right on the median price for new cars in the US, believe it or not. Crazy. But yeah, an Outback is still cheaper
6.
▲
by
dalyons
12d ago
For them maybe - rich enough and or old enough to avoid the problem. Big problem for the rest of us
7.
▲
by
dalyons
12d ago
As in scientifically proven to be biologically ideal, proven to have the best sleep outcomes. You can have different preferences of course, doesn’t change what’s ideal.
8.
▲
by
dalyons
15d ago
and thats fine by me! if we covered just the average daily cycle with batteries (like cali is closing in on) then you're talking like a 95% non-fossil production for the year. We've effectively won the climate crisis at that point
9.
▲
by
dalyons
15d ago
is is often repeated in these threads, baseload generation is an obsolete term. Base load itself is real - the minimum demand on the grid, usually in the early am. Base load generation was a term given to a class of generators (mainly coal
10.
▲
by
dalyons
15d ago
Do you think in the current situation they are more or less likely to try for a nuke than before?
11.
▲
by
dalyons
15d ago
Then why is California down to 25% fossil generation from 60% a few years ago? And still dropping fast as more and more batteries and renewables come on line. Tell me again how baseload generation is still a relevant concept
12.
▲
by
dalyons
15d ago
Nah, it’s coz they were almost all built in an era before renewables became cheaper than coal in the last few years.
13.
▲
by
dalyons
15d ago
A one party state where the plants are owned, insured, backstopped and cleaned up for free by the government doesn’t have the same economics as free market builds. And even with all that their total share of nuclear is declining y/&
14.
▲
by
dalyons
22d ago
Or they could get with the times and build a ton of battery like California. Down to 25% fossil in 2026 due to the massive success of shifting solar into the night with batteries. the answers exist, euro states just can’t get out of their o
15.
▲
by
dalyons
22d ago
Australian electricity in 2026 is about 45% renewable. And rising fast. 40% of Australian homes have rooftop solar. How is this “not much progress”? Yes more could be done but that is massive progress Also, I’m not sure what point you’re ma
16.
▲
by
dalyons
24d ago
Nuke fanboys hate this one weird trick (economics)
17.
▲
by
dalyons
24d ago
The peak of ICE car sales (which includes hybrids) was in 2017 and it’s been downhill since then, and it’s going to plummet from here as EV share keeps growing rapidly. Bev share is growing significantly faster than hybrid. I personally wo
18.
▲
by
dalyons
24d ago
I find this a correct and astute observation, and I don’t think you’re getting enough credit for it. I started noticing this SV C level groupthink a few years ago too. It’s just so _weird_ how lockstep everyone is, it’s like there isn’t a s
19.
▲
by
dalyons
25d ago
Is that supposed to be an example of a good decision? Outside the US hybrids are quickly becoming irrelevant. The decision is looking like it will cost Toyota the crown
20.
▲
by
dalyons
27d ago
How about you try to explain how this changes the economics of nuclear, and I’ll wait.
21.
▲
by
dalyons
27d ago
You just keep moving the goalposts and not responding to arguments. Until you have some idea of how nuclear is ever going to be cost competitive on today’s grids, good day to you.
22.
▲
by
dalyons
27d ago
This is some “both sides” absolute bullshit. The Biden administration passed the IRA, huge incentives for personal and commercial renewable energy production, EVs, all kinds of things. Trump is paying people to burn more coal, blocking sola
23.
▲
by
dalyons
28d ago
Cars probably. My car reads and sends iMessages via Bluetooth.
24.
▲
by
dalyons
28d ago
thats, not true at all. Safety costs a little, but they are fundamentally massively complicated, huge, specialized, EXPENSIVE things to build. They require 100s of staff to run at all times. The insurance is so expensive only nation states
25.
▲
by
dalyons
28d ago
i know they are (or claim to be). Im extremely unconvinced that meaningfully changes the flawed economics of nuclear power. I would love to be proven wrong and a wave of innovative economically competitive nuclear technology emerges... pos
26.
▲
by
dalyons
28d ago
The latest figures from ember etc are not only “sun shining”, they’re talking about 24hr firmed solar-storage costs, and they’re still mostly cheaper than fossil in most geos. It is true that we will have to pay for having gas fill the gaps
27.
▲
by
dalyons
28d ago
I mean, sounds kinda cool. But that 2023 idea is very clearly not going to happen in the current US political environment. We’re in an era of brutal capitalism, and nothing else matters but price. Not even emissions sadly. Green compacts l
28.
▲
by
dalyons
29d ago
which is great, but as i understand it will still lead to an overall decline in share of nuclear power. The scale of their power production is unfathomable
29.
▲
by
dalyons
29d ago
Solar produces incredibly cheap power for the daytime hours, pushing any nuclear off the grid (why would a data center buy expensive nuke power in the hours when cheap renewables are available?). Nuclear needs to be running and selling powe
30.
▲
by
dalyons
29d ago
it is not at all a perfect match for nuclear. Solar produces incredibly cheap power for the daytime hours, pushing the nuclear off the grid (why would a data center buy expensive nuke power in the hours when cheap renewables are available?)
More ›