dagmx

20 ms·

181.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Ah weird the link didn’t work. It looks like their site overrides the url that is set for link sharing. This one should work, copied it from the address bar instead. https://satechi.net/products/pro-hub-slim?variant=401
182.
by dagmx 10mo ago
It’s significantly more straight forward to go from a higher level to a lower level representation than it is to go between different high level representations. That’s not to trivialize what a compiler does, but it’s effectively going from
183.
by dagmx 10mo ago
If you have a 3D printer you can print enclosures https://www.printables.com/model/139879-framework-laptop-exp...
184.
by dagmx 10mo ago
XPS are pretty mediocre build quality in my experience. Precisions are better.
185.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Dell build quality and longevity vary wildly. My XPS 15 had a host of issues, all of which occurred commmonly but weren’t knowable at the time of purchase since it was early. 1. Battery swelling which wrecks the touchpad 2. Sleep issues so
186.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Quite a few laptops support dual side charging fwiw. It’s definitely useful but not all that rare.
187.
by dagmx 10mo ago
The modules are just inset usb-c dongles. Handy that you can have them fully encased but there’s nothing really limiting any other laptop on this front. You just use an external dongle and have the same flexibility. Maybe some people really
188.
by dagmx 10mo ago
That’s a bit of an uncharitable take. Fleet was very stable to use , it just never successfully turned into a product which they address in their link as well why that happened
189.
by dagmx 10mo ago
It’ll go through. It’s not an acquisition, it’s an exclusive licensing deal. Same end result, but it lets them runaround the usual regulatory approvals for acquisitions.
190.
by dagmx 10mo ago
All the other IDEs they have are variants of IDEA. Fleet is a completely different codebase. So they’re correct, there’s only two families of IDEs.
191.
by dagmx 10mo ago
By whose definition of reasonable though? Without knowledge of costs of delivery, api development and support, anything dealing in terms of subjective reasonable values is just speculation.
192.
by dagmx 10mo ago
This feels very much tinfoil. There’s no incentive to the companies or the employees to draw out the discussion, especially over something so trivial. It’s much more preferable to try and speed through things to get things done in a time fr
193.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Paying users to use your app is against the App Store rules, I’m pretty sure.
194.
by dagmx 10mo ago
But if you were the one who tuned out, then isn’t it uncharitable to describe it as their failing to make you aware of the vote? Isn’t it on you to stay in the loop? Surely they can’t start just pinging everyone who might have cared at some
195.
by dagmx 10mo ago
The key part is “free to play” These would not be free to play. They would have an up front cost beyond what the free users would be paying otherwise.
196.
by dagmx 10mo ago
I’m sure they’ll oppose it but I’m not sure what footing they’d have if this doesn’t fall under googles collusion case, seeing as it’s for everyone in the same boat.
197.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Your statement here is incorrect, or rather out of date. The courts have reaffirmed that they may charge a fee for external payment processors. > I believe the current situation with the App Store is that Apple has been barred by US cour
198.
by dagmx 10mo ago
I would suggest reading the ruling and not the headline. The ruling specifically states that Apple can charge a fee , just not the fee they had previously chosen of standard rates minus 3%. It may very well be that googles pricing structure
199.
by dagmx 10mo ago
This is only for apps distributed on the Google play store. It has no bearing on fdroid.
200.
by dagmx 10mo ago
I’m not sure what you’re referring to here. Google are the file distributor for content from their store. These rules aren’t for linking out from the store to a third party site, but rather for installing an app from the store and then link
201.
by dagmx 10mo ago
I think you’ve misread the Apple ruling. The appeals court has said they may charge some amount, just not the higher amount that was originally set. The costs provided here may very well fall into the acceptable boundaries for the courts.
202.
by dagmx 10mo ago
I’m very curious how Tim Sweeney will react to this. This is very much not the victory lap he was hoping to take (nor are the Apple rulings) 1. I think uptake of third party stores is quite low and there’s a strong incentive to stay availab
203.
by dagmx 10mo ago
You made the statement that Blow doesn’t get political in an attempt to refute someone else’s comment. Other people have proven he does. So either you must concede that your initial rebuke was based on insufficient information, in which cas
204.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Just a comment, that often when people say things that are within your own political belief system, that people often don’t consider them political. But what is neutral to someone is not inherently neutral to others. Or even if it’s neutral
205.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Yes, you can continue to use anything that doesn’t require using Apple services. So you could use your existing apps but not download new ones from the App Store. You could use iMessage with some restrictions. You could use Apple Music but
206.
Meta pauses third-party headset program(roadtovr.com)
1 points by dagmx 10mo ago|0 comments
207.
Alliance for OpenUSD Core Specification 1.0(aousd.org)
1 points by dagmx 10mo ago|0 comments
208.
by dagmx 10mo ago
It’s both sad and believable when I hear that Boz is the most sane of them all. Boz is such a grifter in his online content. He naturally weasel words every little point and while I have no doubt he’s smart, I don’t think I could trust him
209.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Sure, there’s nothing about it that’s tied to ML. It’s faster interconnect , use it for many kinds of shared compute scenarios.
210.
by dagmx 10mo ago
Putting aside feelings on AI, and also putting aside worst case scenarios of the kind of content (which will happen regardless of what they promise), I think this is a terrible move for the brand. Content saturation works out very poorly fo

More ›