3 ms·
I would suggest reading the ruling and not the headline. The ruling specifically states that Apple can charge a fee , just not the fee they had previously chos
by dagmx 10mo ago
I would suggest reading the ruling and not the headline.
The ruling specifically states that Apple can charge a fee , just not the fee they had previously chosen of standard rates minus 3%.
It may very well be that googles pricing structure fits in the realm of what the courts deem as fair.
- modeless 10mo agoI would suggest that $3 and 20% is so far outside the realm of reasonable as to be absurd.
- dagmx 10mo agoBy whose definition of reasonable though? Without knowledge of costs of delivery, api development and support, anything dealing in terms of subjective reasonable values is just speculation.