cyphactor

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cyphactor 3y ago

   I am personally a big fan of a patch stack style workflow. I have created a tool called Git Patch Stack, https://git-ps.sh which makes it easier to manage a stack of patches, request review of them, re-request review of them, an
2. 2.▲
   by cyphactor 5y ago

   We are working on support for requesting review of a series of patches right now. But generally you want to avoid that and get your individual patches reviewed as early as possible anyways.
3. 3.▲
   by cyphactor 5y ago

   In my opinion git-ps provides a much nicer patch workflow similar to Phabricator while still supporting GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab for peer reviews. * https://github.com/uptech/git-ps * a detailed walkthrough https:
4. 4.▲
   by cyphactor 5y ago

   git-ps is an extension on top of Git to allow you to basically locally manage a stack of patches. Once you are then ready to have one of those patches peer reviewed you do a git ps rr <patch-index> and it takes and creates branch appr
5. 5.▲
   by cyphactor 5y ago

   I highly suggest reading my article on How we should be using Git. It covers a Git Patch Stack workflow, where it originated from and the tooling we built around it. It has important ties to how the Linux Kernel and Git dev teams work as we
6. 6.▲
   Pull Request Notifications: An Anti-Pattern(upte.ch)

   2 points by cyphactor 8y ago|0 comments