5 ms·
In my opinion git-ps provides a much nicer patch workflow similar to Phabricator while still supporting GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab for peer reviews. * https:
by cyphactor 5y ago
In my opinion git-ps provides a much nicer patch workflow similar to Phabricator while still supporting GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab for peer reviews.
* https://github.com/uptech/git-ps https://github.com/uptech/git-ps
* a detailed walkthrough https://upte.ch/blog/how-we-should-be-using-git/ https://upte.ch/blog/how-we-should-be-using-git/
- ezyang 5y agoI definitely miss hg’s affordances like hg next/prev and restack. It doesn’t look like, though, that git-ps lets you submit multiple patches for review, this was the raison d’etre for ghstack
- cyphactor 5y agoWe are working on support for requesting review of a series of patches right now. But generally you want to avoid that and get your individual patches reviewed as early as possible anyways.
- ezyang 5y agoDoesn't help when it can take several days to land! (e.g., waiting for CI.) But I will admit this is a problem that is somewhat specific to the nature of our project :)