cxr

44 ms·

751.
by cxr 2y ago
> The implication here is that any code committed to a public repository may be accessible forever That's exactly how you should treat anything made available to the public (and there's no need for the subsequent qualifier that
752.
by cxr 2y ago
You mean a redirect to < https://one.one.one.one/ >, but that's beside the point. Can you or can't you get a certificate for an IP address to "do SSL" (TLS) that is trusted by major browsers?
753.
by cxr 2y ago
> Your confidence that there is an obviously optimal way to model something You're imagining things (uncharitably); that's not in the comment you replied to.
754.
by cxr 2y ago
Steve has a car. The car is yellow. All yellow cars are driven by Steve. (Except not.) You have posted an observation about non-profit organizations and described a defining characteristic of donations that go to them. You have not give
755.
by cxr 2y ago
> You’re getting mad because Anyone who uses this "trick" automatically loses whether they know it or not.
756.
by cxr 2y ago
https://1.1.1.1/
757.
by cxr 2y ago
There's a whiff of a suggestion with this comment that makes it seem like the intent is to frame it as a contradiction of the comment it's a reply to, but it isn't.
758.
by cxr 2y ago
Thinking lowly of a company's customer service based on how few person-to-person interactions one has had with them is just about the dumbest stance a person could take on the matter. It's on par with the attitude where workers a
759.
by cxr 2y ago
> 1,251 registrars are operated by NameBright Meanwhile, NameBright doesn't even have a Wikipedia article. (Readers are encouraged to try the same experiment with the trusted set of CAs with root certificates that ship with their We
760.
by cxr 2y ago
If you're trying to make a donation to a project but want to be able to specify what they can(not) do with the money, then you're not really trying to make a donation.
761.
by cxr 2y ago
> Any thoughts? 10–50 pages per second is already more output than a human can produce input for, so it shouldn't be considered a problem.
762.
by cxr 2y ago
If you don't want to maintain infrastructure, don't adopt the kinds of software stacks created by the kinds of people who have only ever shown a giddiness for producing devops shovelware that assumes/requires maintenance. Eve
763.
Visibility Jam 2024(handmade.network)
1 points by cxr 2y ago|0 comments
764.
Visibility Jam 2024(handmade.network)
1 points by cxr 2y ago|0 comments
765.
by cxr 2y ago
It's the lying that would result in jail. That's what perjury is about. It's not as if courts in the UK are filled with a bunch of Bitcoin enthusiasts who are mad at the guy for taking credit they don't think he deserve
766.
by cxr 2y ago
For programming and debugging to be really visual and really succeed, it needs to be in three dimensions. Like a shop floor that you can roam around, pull things off the conveyor, inspect and tweak them with your hands, and then put them b
767.
by cxr 2y ago
> Something like that really deserves to be written in C so you don't need to install Ghidra to use it. By that logic, it should be written in JS so you don't need to install a C build toolchain for it.
768.
by cxr 2y ago
Previously: < https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40859854 > 9 (13) days ago. 46 points. 8-ish comments.
769.
by cxr 2y ago
Link-in-bio services would be a lot more useful if they accepted a link from the reader—the link of the item that referred them there because the platform it was on didn't allow direct-linking to off-site pages—and then returned the li
770.
by cxr 2y ago
> I always include a title along with the URL The fact that people use the HTML title attribute for everything except for including the proper title of the thing pointed to is sort of perturbing. Even for Google SERPs and here on HN,
771.
by cxr 2y ago
> You just have to make sure you have populated the content at the location you are referencing before you upload You don't even have to do that, though. It suffices to say, "I'll wire these things up on Monday."
772.
by cxr 2y ago
I don't know what you're talking about at the end, but you're definitely applying an inconsistent (double) standard at at least one point in your comment. The status quo is one where the reference is either completely unreso
773.
by cxr 2y ago
It's like you didn't understand anything that I wrote.
774.
by cxr 2y ago
Two under-utilized properties of URLs are also that: - there's a near-infinite supply of them - they support forward declaration Together the practical upshot is that if you're having a conversation with someone or responding duri
775.
by cxr 2y ago
> There needs to be a way to add an annotation[...] to a previous message to correct assumptions You rarely want to do _just_ this, i.e. call out the bad commit message in question and nothing else; you're generally going to have so
776.
by cxr 2y ago
In principle, that's something that could be allowed without giving access "to" Google/the site owner—even allowing the site author to provide their own functions for formatting and drawing the values—and thus could be a
777.
by cxr 2y ago
One thing to start with is to not throw the user into a screen consisting of a grid of fixed width character cells at the very beginning. This is what immediately sends a signal of discomfort to most users not already familiar with termina
778.
by cxr 2y ago
You can also check out the discussion for Figma's earlier work on their plugin system, which is what inspired jitl (above) to create quickjs-emscripten. Previously: How to build a plugin system on the web and also sleep well at night
779.
by cxr 2y ago
The closest thing I know of is Allen Wirfs-Brock's jsmirrors prototype, but he never got to speccing out anything for DOM (and never really intended to as far as I know). Just capabilities for JS-the-programming-system. You could look
780.
by cxr 2y ago
Better version with inline images: < https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-the-rise-of-the-c... >

More ›