cube00

24 ms·

571.
by cube00 1y ago
It's such a useless platitude. The "higher value work" is answer more calls so we can have less staff on queue.
572.
by cube00 1y ago
Unless a case goes down the legal road, nobody is ever bothering to read old call summaries in a giant call center. When was the last time you called a large company and the person answering was already across all the past history without y
573.
by cube00 1y ago
It makes people feel like they're in control of the text prediction agent when actually it'll only follow this some of the time. 1. I tell Copilot until I'm blue in the face that the project must build. 2. Copilot assures m
574.
by cube00 1y ago
It seems like a lie because they tried to hide this incident by deflecting to a PR fluff post first [1] They only published a proper [2] disclosure post later once their hand was forced after the researcher's post hit the HN front page
575.
by cube00 1y ago
They weren't published together. They managed to get the researchers to add CodeRabbit's talking points in after the fact, check out the blue text on the right hand side. https://web.archive.org/web/diff/
576.
by cube00 1y ago
They weren't published together. The early version of the researcher's article didn't have the whole first section where they "appreciate CodeRabbit’s swift action after we reported this security vulnerability" and
577.
by cube00 1y ago
They seem to have left out a point in their "Our immediate response" section: - within 8 months: published the details after researchers publish it first.
578.
by cube00 1y ago
When they're spinning it [1] as a PR opportunity with no mention of the breach there won't be a bounty. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44954242
579.
by cube00 1y ago
Let's hope the grants keep coming in because those researchers will start getting offers from the darker corners of the web if bounties aren't paid.
580.
by cube00 1y ago
I can't say I'm surprised they didn't pay a bounty when they couldn't even own up to this on their own blog [1]. Instead they took it as an opportunity to market their new sandboxing on Google's blog [2] again with
581.
by cube00 1y ago
> - **NEVER** use phrases like "You're absolutely right!", "You're absolutely correct!", "Excellent point!", or similar flattery > - **NEVER** validate statements as "right" when the u
582.
by cube00 1y ago
If we tell it a rival LLM wrote the code it will be extra critical to tap into of its capitalist streak to crush the competition?
583.
by cube00 1y ago
>And it actually learns from mistakes with a properly crafted instruction ...until it hallucinates and ignores said instruction.
584.
by cube00 1y ago
> Tell Claude your developer finished XYZ [...] (Claude will find more problems with your developer's work than with yours). It's crazy to think LLMs are so focused on pleasing us that we have to trick them like this to get fra
585.
by cube00 1y ago
>You always think deeply before giving an answer... Nice try but they're not giving you the "think deeper" level just because you asked.
586.
by cube00 1y ago
> It feels like everyone now has to write a mandatory MCP article... Like this one you can bet every blogspam article is also trying to push something... > The Part Where I Tell You I'm Building Something
587.
by cube00 1y ago
I wouldn't call it cynicism. Web services started as the same open utopia. Once everyone was in they jacked up the prices so high it killed the initial consumer apps (eg. Google Maps and Reddit) Nobody is giving access to their walled
588.
by cube00 1y ago
It's really surprising that no CDNs or cloud storage providers offer even the single PMTiles file in some sort of shared library customers can use. I guess they'd all rather their customers each upload the 120GB file and then char
589.
by cube00 1y ago
Hopefully you've been able to contribute back financially if you're making money from this service.
590.
by cube00 1y ago
I can't understand why all the AI services are allowed to get away with modes such as "deep thinking" and "deep research". OpenAI even claims "reasoning" is available. > Built-in agents – deep research,
591.
by cube00 1y ago
> It was fun asking GPT-5 [...] to provide [...] insights into myself! Were those insights of a glowing and positive nature by chance?
592.
by cube00 1y ago
>As an aside, does anyone know why the AI labs have such bad recruiters? They're using their own slop generator to handle recruitment.
593.
by cube00 1y ago
>create original content (music, images, videos, text) Remixing would be more accurate then "original"
594.
by cube00 1y ago
> Some people are also more susceptible to various too-good-to-be-true scams Unlike a regular scam, there's an element of "boiling frog" with LLMs. It can start out reasonably, but very slowly over time it shifts. Unlike s
595.
by cube00 1y ago
Thank you for sharing. I'm glad your wife and friends were able to pull you out before it was too late. "People Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasies" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4389
596.
by cube00 1y ago
> Isn't security the number one priority in those spaces? Money changing hands between suitable people who pop up together at the right social occasions is the priority.
597.
by cube00 1y ago
Alls LLM have this risk but somehow nobody seems to care or they think they can order the LLM to stop with a better prompt.
598.
by cube00 1y ago
How many years have they been pushing that line now?
599.
by cube00 1y ago
Hopefully better then the hell that is trying to use Amazon Q for development.
600.
by cube00 1y ago
Gnome enjoys the impossibly thin scrollbars too even when you do manage to find them.

More ›