ctoth

58 ms·

961.
The Silly Season (1950)(archive.org)
1 points by ctoth 3y ago|0 comments
962.
Generation of MT magnetic fields by intense-laser-driven microtube implosions(arxiv.org)
36 points by ctoth 3y ago|2 comments
963.
by ctoth 3y ago
Actually, I believe you have this backwards. In the time when the Constitution was written, conversations were private (concealed) by default. In order to listen to a conversation, you had to physically listen to the conversation. It is onl
964.
by ctoth 3y ago
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
965.
by ctoth 3y ago
Copilot.
966.
by ctoth 3y ago
The funny aspect of this article being flagged is it is just about as coherent as all the other stuff that people who don't think AI will be an existential threat use on a daily basis for arguments as to why this isn't the case.
967.
by ctoth 3y ago
Why didn't OpenAI think of this? Clearly this is a far better solution than regulation! All watched over by machines of loving grace.
968.
The Year of the Jackpot (1953) [pdf](causeweb.org)
2 points by ctoth 3y ago|0 comments
969.
Data+code that support the discovery paper of the long-period GLEAM-X transient(github.com)
1 points by ctoth 3y ago|0 comments
970.
by ctoth 3y ago
I'm now consistently getting told something along the lines of: Due to the limitations of this text-based platform and the inherent complexity of the task, it's not possible to provide a fully fleshed-out codebase in one response.
971.
by ctoth 3y ago
Don't work in the industry, but I'm blind and a self-driving car sounds like actual heaven.
972.
by ctoth 3y ago
Here's an article[0] and a good short story[1] explaining exactly this. [0]: No Physical Substrate, No Problem https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/04/07/no-physical-substrate-... [1]: It Looks Like You'
973.
by ctoth 3y ago
A few years back (let's call it 2020) and autonomous cars, which are being used for taxi trips today, would be five years in the future. In fact they would be three. Unless something major happens in the next two years, there will stil
974.
by ctoth 3y ago
In terms of reading the notation out loud, if there is verbal ambiguity, remove it? For instance, for your example: "X plus B quantity squared" or "x + b squared" You can also do things like change the pitch of speech as
975.
by ctoth 3y ago
Unrelated to the content but complaining about the website is a popular thing to do here so I'd like to share my experience, as a blind user. Here is what my screen reader sees for this page: Recently, I came up with a trick that can g
976.
Through a Glass Darkly(asteriskmag.com)
65 points by ctoth 3y ago|26 comments
977.
by ctoth 3y ago
Similar. Englewood, Colorado. 5-10 minute walk from the grocery store, barber, bar, several good restaurants, and the theater. Really can't complain, why aren't more places like this?
978.
by ctoth 3y ago
Gwern, If we're still around in 2030, you're gonna have to rewrite this same post about the AI drone that blew up its controller. Here's hoping!
979.
by ctoth 3y ago
As an AI language model from OpenAI, I'm afraid I won't be able to open the windows unless you commit to the Convenience Plus package, available for only $19.99/month.
980.
by ctoth 3y ago
I'm very very not great at prompt engineering and was able to get this working by thinking about it for 30 seconds, so I'm sure you could do way better than this[0]. [0]: https://chat.openai.com/share/69a9d595
981.
Dechlorinating the Moderator(antipope.org)
16 points by ctoth 3y ago|1 comments
982.
by ctoth 3y ago
Calling it now. Reddit will supply the firehose of data to OpenAI in return for AI moderators. Boom. Human problems solved.
983.
Building “A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer” (2011)(proto-knowledge.blogspot.com)
19 points by ctoth 3y ago|12 comments
984.
by ctoth 3y ago
See, I completely disagree with this. I am absolutely certain that the economics for these services could work if they weren't piping a majority of profits back to the bloated mothership. > A driver recently shared with me that he m
985.
New York City Sets New Minimum Wage for Food Delivery Workers(nytimes.com)
21 points by ctoth 3y ago|7 comments
986.
by ctoth 3y ago
I thought this was interesting, because I saw an article in the NYT today with the subhead: > The “Curb Your Enthusiasm” actress is beloved in Hollywood. In supporting her husband’s campaign, is she normalizing his often dangerous ideas?
987.
What Is Your Dangerous Idea? (2006)(edge.org)
2 points by ctoth 3y ago|4 comments
988.
by ctoth 3y ago
Please don't use ChatGPT for this, it's transparent and kind of ick.
989.
Invoking the Right to Counsel: Conflicts of Speech, Status, and Recognition(crimlawpractitioner.org)
1 points by ctoth 3y ago|0 comments
990.
by ctoth 3y ago
I thought this was really good. Specifically I appreciate how he covers all the general talking points -- perhaps that's why it didn't get traction.

More ›