cto_of_antifa

18 ms·

1.
by cto_of_antifa 2y ago
there's nothing inherently wrong with recreational drug use
2.
by cto_of_antifa 3y ago
Terrible example, since the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also extremely unethical
3.
by cto_of_antifa 3y ago
they probably don't do it because it's a bad solution.
4.
by cto_of_antifa 4y ago
Or, said anorher way, it becomes more difficult for them to profit off of the labor of others.
5.
by cto_of_antifa 4y ago
I just want to say that I read this whole thread and while I'm not entirely sure i agree with you politically I think this statement is amazing and very well said.
6.
by cto_of_antifa 4y ago
That specific example seems sorta yikes opinion for somebody with hiring power. Aren't people who get targeted by MLMs victims? More importantly, what does that say about how hard they work? Or being a mom?
7.
by cto_of_antifa 4y ago
Pretty messed up they wouldn't let you endanger them at their own workplace
8.
by cto_of_antifa 4y ago
The other option would be brazing with jewelry silver at like $60/oz. Yikes.
9.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Maybe you shouldn't do it, then?
10.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Wouldn't it add another ten Ms every time you opened a new terminal session?
11.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Not the parent, but my thought is, and their comment seems to suggest, that the sheer density of exciting, new, and groundbreaking CS work is an absolutely energizing thing to read about.
12.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
That's your ethical call to make, at the end of the day - but I think putting property above human life shows a distinct lack of empathy.
13.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Citation needed. Plus, even if it is natural, that's not an argument about it being a good thing
14.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Even if that was true, though, does that make it okay? Does that reduce the need to fight against it?
15.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Hard to be the smuggest dude in the valley at 1% opacity. Gotta keep the points up
16.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
if we return to the original test case, then, who is lobbying to make taxes not require turbotax?
17.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
Why is that bad? Do you think it's worth reflecting on why it bothers you?
18.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
I love this.
19.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
It’s generally considered polite to refer To people the way they want to be referred to. It’s relevant.
20.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
By that logic, isn't taxing lower-income people taking even more money out of the economy, since poorer people spend a much higher percentage of their earnings?
21.
by cto_of_antifa 5y ago
To be fair, if you made the pitch that way to farmer today they would as well - those points are all iffy. mostly, though, the nature of labor has completely and utterly changed in 80 years and comparing the two is like apples and oranges.