Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
csallen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
451.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
You can also buy Biscoff cookie butter. Which is absurdly delicious if you like the cookies.
452.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
FWIW, I've read that multiple people committed suicide in despair of the financial ruin caused by SBF's fraud. So he did do things worthy of hefty punishment. Stealing money may not inherently "feel" like a real crime, b
453.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Nobody in this thread said they need OpenAI to provide them discoverability.
454.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
"Aim for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." This is an area where I think this quote applies. Don't reach Google status and build the next $1T company? Okay, maybe you'll make a unicorn. Don&#
455.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Starting a successful company is not an essentially impossible pipe dream. There are literally millions of businesses in the US that are generating millions in revenue. Sure, they aren't all mega behemoth tech companies, but what of it
456.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
> when you can get 99% of the benefits by baking the output of gen AI in the game with none of the drawbacks like losing the shared experience of a game or playing roulette with the quality of someone's experience. You're mak
457.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
This take makes no sense to me. I would bet you any amount of money that, 5 years from now, there will be fun+successful games that use modern AI to make NPCs more realistic than they are today. And I guarantee you wouldn't take that b
458.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
I mean, you're imagining unfun things, and then declaring them unfun, rather than imagining fun things. Of course unfun implementations would be unfun. But what the gp was clearly intending to suggest was fun implementations of more
459.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Both the Milky Way and sardine sandwiches are visible objects. That's a comparison that's not disingenuous. If you're going to label a comparison as disingenuous, the onus is on you to provide a reason why. Otherwise, you
460.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Anything can be compared. In fact, you may be surprised to learn that the entire point of the word "compare" is to point out similarities between otherwise dissimilar things.
461.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
The U.S. government (federal and state) spend more than $10T annually. By comparison, the top 1% wealthy Americans combined donate about 1% of that amount ($100B) annually. Furthermore, government spending is ostensibly in the hands of the
462.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
I think a better explanation is that authors and other creators of public works are concerned with how they will be perceived. Otherwise, they wouldn't spend months and years meticulously editing and improving their works before releas
463.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Yes.
464.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
I'm not sure this is the same "type" of group. There have always been those who neglect to adopt the technology of the day or buy heavily into the culture, without also buying into some sort of counter-cultural movement. Toda
465.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Twitter gets 500 million new tweets every day. HN has 39 million comments after 17 years. HN is small.
466.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
> This is not “influence and inspiration”, this is companies feeding other people’s work into a commercial product which they sell access to. The product would be useless without other people’s work, therefore they should be compensated
467.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
> No matter how you try to spin this, it's by all accounts an act of discrimination to pay one person less than another purely based on where they live. . Companies aren't gods charged with dispensing fair wages to us mortals.
468.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
On the contrary, due to devices like phones and the internet, I have a smaller number of interruptive people in my immediate vicinity than I probably would have decades or centuries ago. Friends and loved ones feel more comfortable moving a
469.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
In all of the places named above, people have interrupted me more than once a day, and I don't think that's abnormal. And again, it's much easier and less rude to put my phone on silent for unknown numbers, than it is to igno
470.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
What common physical space keeps people from interrupting you? - I had my own room as a kid. My parents and brother banged on the door whenever they pleased. - I worked at a tech company, had my own desk, and wore headphones. Coworkers stil
471.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
In the prehistoric era (and continuing into the present day), all that's required to interrupt someone is a set of vocal chords you can use to talk to them, or a finger you can use to tap them on the shoulder, or a fist you can use to
472.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Is the author of this game doing that?
473.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
One person's specific usage of AI, in a specific game, where the AI was constrained to only coming up with words that have an associated emoji, is not a referendum on whether or not AI itself has common sense. That's like saying p
474.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
Yeah most likely
475.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
It was the original origin of the name Slack, actually
476.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
> somewhere in-between laissez faire capitalism and mandatory state-ownership of all industry > Yes, which describes both the US and Europe. It just comes down to where to fall on that spectrum.
477.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
You might want to edit your post. It seems like you're asking when to go full time on your startup, but you haven't made that context sufficiently clear, and people will have to read between the lines to get that. A lot of people
478.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
"milquetoastian nature"?
479.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
A neural net designed to do nothing other than compress and decompress a copyrighted work is completely different than GPT-4, unless I'm uninformed. To me that sounds like comparing a VCR to a brain. GPT-4's technology is clearly
480.
▲
by
csallen
3y ago
I'd say that a tool itself can't be guilty of copyright infringement, only the person using the tool can. So it doesn't matter if the GPT has some sort of "notion" of a copyrighted work in it or not. GPTs aren'
More ›