Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
creddit
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Designer != dev, right? The top entry on his LI also appears to be a marketing role?
62.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
You're in Japan, yeah? Seems like that might be a barrier if you're applying for SV jobs.
63.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> I think the author is talking about pretty large, well-known companies (e.g., FAANG -- see his first point). Except almost nothing outside of some amount of resume filtering fits his points. Seriously, go to levels.fyi and look at the
64.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
I'm pseudonymous for a reason but here's a list of companies, none of which I am employed at, that have similar pay and issues with staffing: Uber, Doordash, Asana, AirBnB, Pinterest, LinkedIn and literally so many more. Especiall
65.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
I literally can’t relate to this on any level. I’m an HM at a company that pays on the order of a FANG and at best matches one of these credentialist barriers and yet we can’t come close to hiring targets on devs. I don’t get how people can
66.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> With Uber they seem to take pretty close to half get to push all the vehicle expenses on the driver. This is only seems to be true, depending on definitions, when the fares are low. On a dollar basis, it seems, from my quick googling,
67.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
To add to the pile on of support for RSS, I use it daily! I use the Reeder App across my Mac, iPhone and iPad.
68.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
But why on earth call it that? It's the same number of syllables, more letters, additional punctuation and also not in common use. So odd.
69.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
The ‘zon????
70.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Why are you so wed to the idea that these protocols are in some sense correct? So many people have basically asserted infallibility for the CDC/FDA throughout this pandemic despite their consistent failures across huge swaths of the re
71.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> Personally, I prefer drug safety protocols be based on science, not what people feel, or whether or not it's "good politics". Implicit to this point is that what the CDC/FDA did was "good science" and not
72.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
It's like a Twitter thread in here.
73.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Dublinben: "How do you lower the cost of housing in desirable places?" You: "You don’t, you can’t build your way out of these kinds of problems" Me: "Yes, you can. Tokyo and Houston are perfect counterexamples."
74.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
He's making a joke. The kid isn't going to jail for this. What's more, there's no evidence the kid or his family is poor. He might've done it because he was scared of asking his parents to buy a new one because he b
75.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Yes, you can. Tokyo and Houston are perfect counterexamples. Obviously government is required for the planning and zoning reform aspects but the idea that any solution to housing price issues isn't building more is non-sensical. Sing
76.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> And even if you “win”, the result is a more livable city that attracts even more people, leading to price increases nonetheless. Your statement boils down to "supply can never outstrip demand" which is trivially falsifiable i
77.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
I mean, yeah clearly? Your own source for what is nearly the worst case in the world is ongoing investment of “US$200 per capita and year”. Look at how much the home values have increased! Do you really think that’s not trivially extractabl
78.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
It's like your comment was completely void of any kind of validity and it was easy to immediately look for evidence to the contrary of one of your major points. I'm sure it would be trivial to counter the point around water. Just
79.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Let's check in on the Bozeman population density: 2,448.94 people per square mile Let's check on how San Francisco is doing: 18,790.74 people per square mile. Okay, no worries, Bozeman can keep its current foot print and 8X its po
80.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> However, that local, who isn’t making California money, that is working a local job and making local money and is hoping to move up in housing for their family is priced out because housing pricing has doubled or even tripled. Wouldn&#
81.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> But they don't get health benefits for 3+ months. This isn’t true? https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/healthcare-from-...
82.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Obviously the entire point of this thread is to disparage humanity and not come to meaningful conclusions. For your own sanity, just leave the anti-humanists to their own devices.
83.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
> It says absolutely nothing good about Amazon that the workers voted against unionization. You certainly can’t conclude the workers didn’t want to be unionised. Astounding.
84.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
Yes, but of course it's downvoted because Hacker News users hate the idea that they aren't superior to these working class folks or that they should have the autonomy/capability of self determination. No matter the implicit c
85.
▲
by
creddit
5y ago
That "debunking" is comical. They compared the median wage of a giant metropolitan area to that of a subset of it which is ridiculously impoverished. What's more is the comparison of wages says nothing about other benefits
86.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> Thiel and company repeatedly claim that there is no meaningful difference between the Chinese military and individual Chinese nationals who work for American companies, because China is essentially a fusion state where the government d
87.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Pretty much entirely unaddressed so all in all a pretty bad attempt at a pithy political statement.
88.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
https://vimeo.com/533792077/e3aabe6c8f
89.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> Wouldn't it be better for Amazon, in the long term to let workers get the best salary/benefits in the industry The dirty secret is that Amazon basically already has the best salary/benefits for the job types that are loo
90.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
It's important for many people's belief systems that intelligence is unaffected by physical/evolutionary factors.
More ›