creddit

51 ms·

511.
by creddit 8y ago
Is there a reason to believe it's not? I'm not familiar with any particular Russian bias from Forbes.
512.
by creddit 8y ago
Extreme hyperbole like this rarely helps your case. Please try to elevate your discussion. Elsevier is a significant drain on public benefit relative to free/open journals but that doesn't make them criminal.
513.
by creddit 8y ago
Graphs, widgets and other rich/dynamic output is also possible with the R approach. https://rmarkdown.rstudio.com/ Additionally, Rstudio is an incredibly powerful IDE for data analysis. EDIT: Interestingly, however, I
514.
by creddit 8y ago
That was a typo (now fixed). Didn't mean to imply you were involved with Signal
515.
by creddit 8y ago
I think it's quite clear what the point is from Signal's attempt at implementation of the theory as well as your freshly minted wiki page. That doesn't change the dubious nature of it. Putting other valuable services at risk
516.
by creddit 9y ago
I'm very confused by how you mean this. I don't see why the type of penalties used means the policies aren't for restricting access under your definitions. It seems abundantly clear to me that they restrict access by making
517.
by creddit 9y ago
It was involved in 73 percent of all child trafficking cases reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. The proportion of that site's activities that are related to illegal activities is completely irrelevant
518.
by creddit 9y ago
See Singapore's drug use policies.
519.
by creddit 9y ago
I'm not reasoning through analogies like yours. I was reasoning from principles. Your analogies might be nice sound bites but don't have much value in describing the world. Your problems with SESTA may be valid but that's a c
520.
by creddit 9y ago
This argument is so often used; that shutting down access to one means of doing an illegal or negative act doesn't matter because there are other means and it's always false. Any time you increase the cost of doing something by a