Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
corradio
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
Estimating the marginal carbon intensity of electricity with machine learning
(blog.tmrow.co)
2 points
by
corradio
8y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Let's also remember it matters where the electricity comes from. You're not necessarily going green if you use coal-based electricity. Source: https://www.electricitymap.org
33.
▲
Timelapse of European electricity carbon intensity from electricitymap.org
(youtube.com)
4 points
by
corradio
9y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Feel free to submit a pull request to update our numbers!
35.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
The map does not claim to conclude on anything else than Carbon emissions. Many other things need to be taken into account when considering decisions, and this is merely one decision (albeit a very important one!)
36.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Calculations details are here: https://github.com/tmrowco/electricitymap#carbon-intensity-c... We use IPCC LCA data for the production mix, and use a coupled linear system of equations to take into account imports in a
37.
▲
Live CO2 emissions of electricity consumption
(electricitymap.org)
153 points
by
corradio
9y ago
|
135 comments
38.
▲
California is now on the Electricity Map
(electricitymap.org)
6 points
by
corradio
9y ago
|
0 comments
39.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Good read concerning this topic: Into the Cool ( https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/52737.Into_the_Cool )
40.
▲
A pragmatic guide to Climate Change
(tmrow.com)
8 points
by
corradio
9y ago
|
0 comments
41.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
wait and what's the energy usage of that thing? Carbon footprint?
42.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Tomorrow ( https://www.tmrow.com ) | Copenhagen | Full-time | Onsite / remote We use science, data and machine learning to automatically quantify the environmental impact of our daily decisions. We present this information in
43.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
and that's exactly the point: we should focus on whether or not you got any money from coal, regardless of what you did with it, because that's what is driving emissions in the end.
44.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Quite interesting remark. However, I'm not saying the savings from producing more wind are not real. They are very real, because you avoided using other means of production, potentially fossil fuels. So that's good. On the other h
45.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
We're tracking live electricity generation from solar in the US here: https://www.electricitymap.org Not sure we will be able to see the effect talked about here though.
46.
▲
No, country X did NOT just run entirely on wind
(medium.com)
13 points
by
corradio
9y ago
|
7 comments
47.
▲
by
corradio
9y ago
Live view, including other countries: http://www.electricitymap.org
48.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
sorry for not being clear enough. I meant that the speed of warming is of interest here. That speed is independent of the baseline chosen. And that speed is what is worrying.
49.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
We'd be incredibly unlucky to have missed a temperature change as fast as the one we're measuring now, if it indeed would have been caused by a small sample size of past measurements.
50.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
Take the reference that is 5min ago, call it T0. You will still observe that temperatures (i.e the sequence of measured temperatures minus T0) are increasing. Changing the reference changes the y-scale of a graph, but does not change the de
51.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
You're right. However, it's hard to argue with the speed at which this warming occurs. It's never seen before if you look at all the records we have. That's what's worrying.
52.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
You shouldn't care about what reference is taken. The point is that compared to any reference, the curve is increasing .
53.
▲
One of the most beautiful Polish cities tried to kill me
(medium.com)
1 points
by
corradio
10y ago
|
0 comments
54.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
The easiest fix to the intermittency problem is to use electricity when renewables produce [1]. That would reduce the need for batteries in the beginning. [1] http://www.co2signal.com
55.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
We're looking to expand http://www.electricitymap.org to the US in order to properly visualise this. Can anyone help? I'm looking for volunteers to help here: https://github.com/corradio/electricit
56.
▲
by
corradio
10y ago
Hi there, I'm the author of the map. For sure it can be optimised. If you can help, feel free to do so on github - or reach out so we can chat. Thanks :)
57.
▲
Data visualisation: Climate impact of European electricity production
(electricitymap.tmrow.co)
10 points
by
corradio
10y ago
|
0 comments
58.
▲
Climate impact of European electricity production: a data visualisation
(medium.com)
1 points
by
corradio
10y ago
|
0 comments
59.
▲
Enjoy the journey
(medium.com)
1 points
by
corradio
10y ago
|
0 comments
60.
▲
I don’t think everyone needs to go try to solve some big, world-changing problem
(medium.com)
1 points
by
corradio
10y ago
|
0 comments
More ›