Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cmeacham98
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
When in the process of removing the watermark do I distribute the work?
62.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
It's pretty trivial to find insider trading looking activity as a human, so I doubt it would be particularly difficult to write up an algorithm to do it. Of course you wouldn't come close to catching everything but you'd catc
63.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Why would they write that they aren't fine with it when they are?
64.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
I've never seen any strong evidence for this (only a handful of anecdotes), and my personal experience driving doesn't match. I saw speed traps all the time and don't remember a single one that was associated with a speed lim
65.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Speed traps catch people actually committing crimes. While you as a driver may be disappointed you can't speed (read: break the law) with impunity, I as a pedestrian and public transit user would prefer more speed traps and harsher enf
66.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Because Docker/OCI/etc got the most important part right (or at least much better than the alternatives): distribution. All you need to start running a Docker container is a location and tag (or hash). To update, all you do is bum
67.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Obfuscation tools like these only slow down attackers, they can never stop them. Even the best in the game, where there are strong financial incentives on the line, fall to attackers typically in a matter of months. As such, you should neve
68.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
More likely guess, given a refresh fixed it: there was a slight delay with the CT log and it hadn't started returning the precertificate yet.
69.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
No, actually, they don't say that. They very clearly say that they don't (and don't believe most people will) consider what they are doing "selling your data", but that it may legally considered selling your data in
70.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
No, actually, they don't say that. They very clearly say that they don't (and don't believe most people will) consider what they are doing "selling your data", but that it may legally considered selling your data in
71.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
If we manage to read the next 2 questions on the list, or spend 30 seconds on a web search, one would find the link to Firefox's privacy policy which details the specific types of data they collect and how they use it, and has enumerat
72.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
They replaced that paragraph with this: > Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data“), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale
73.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
This math doesn't add up: I just checked a random paradox game, Stellaris, and it has 24 paid DLC (26 actually, but I've excluded an eBook and soundtrack as neither seem to have an in-game impact) - but was released in 2016.
74.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Disclaimer: I work for Amazon, but not on ECR or ECR Public. The rate limit for unauthenticated pulls is 1/second/IP, source: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/ecr-public.htm...
75.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
No - most cloud providers are postpaid, you use their services and then get a bill at the end of the month. Making your payment method invalid doesn't absolve you of this debt and will just result in being sent to collections and/
76.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Using WordPress.org services isn't some rogue hotlink, it's hardcoded into the WordPress source code. And Matt explicitly refuses to add a config option to switch servers[1] - you have to manually patch WP to do so. Legally, he ma
77.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Can you give an example of a copyright lawsuit lost by a 'normal person' that's doing the same thing OpenAI is?
78.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
I work for Amazon, but not directly on web crawling. Based on the internal information I have been able to gather, it is highly unlikely this is actually Amazon. Amazonbot is supposed to respect robots.txt and should always come from an Ama
79.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Presumably it's a bug/defect in the TV. While that is stupid and I would return such a defective product, there's a difference between "my TV's mute is broken" and "my TV specifically unmutes itself during
80.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
> this is probably a mitigating control which would make exploit development much harder in case an exploit chain attempted to leverage one of those RWX areas for execution This didn't pass the sniff test for me - this doesn't
81.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Mr Beast targets and is very successful in the children (think pre-teen/teen) demographic. His videos often feature giving away a large sum of money or other prize via an elaborate contest/challenge, and he's the YouTuber tha
82.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
If anybody that runs the website is here, may I suggest the ability to filter/sort the talks by language? Several of the talks are given in a language I'm not fluent in, and not all contain translations.
83.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
> You can't just say that you don't want to host any content that goes through a counter notice. Why not? (at least legally speaking, it'd be a PR disaster I'm sure) YouTube is not obligated to host any videos on thei
84.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Fair warning - this is a bash-ism, so if you're writing a script that needs to run on multiple shells and/or a more primitive shell, you should avoid it.
85.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
"A large part of it" However, the evidence is that "at least two" Congressmen mentioned it as a reason a single time each.
86.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Highly unethical in my opinion to not disclose the tool is summarizing via an LLM. As a matter of fact, in the right circumstances it may not only fail to do what the title says, but do the opposite - add hallucinations or other AI generate
87.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Is C actually good at writing a phishing page (or any webpage)? (Although I'm not sure I would consider Rust to be adept in that category either...)
88.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
As you seem to be Alexander Borsuk... Why the removal of the MIT license? Was that decision put to a vote like "all important project decisions" are? I assume it can't have been unless Roman is blatantly lying about only noti
89.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
I don't see one on the pricing page either: https://kagi.com/pricing?plan=team However, based on that page, the team plan cannot be prepaid annually for a discount, so if you are willing to do that the individual plan
90.
▲
by
cmeacham98
2y ago
Employers might be willing to get their employees a subscription if they believe it makes their employees they are paying $$$$$ more X% productive. (Where X% of their salary works out to more than $2400/year)
More ›