chii

13 ms·

211.
by chii 6mo ago
> They matter a lot because they're the ones that push your design language, develop new ideas, influence the general community, build new programs, find your bugs, and all of that they used to care, but they don't now, because
212.
by chii 6mo ago
I think making the bets not anonymous is sufficient imho. If a gov't official (including the president) is leaking classified information, there's already laws about that isnt there? (Whether it's effective is another questio
213.
by chii 6mo ago
> Congrats, your price movement signaled non public information to the market! so from bin laden's perspective, this would've been a good outcome isnt it? Can't say what a good outcome is without saying who. What if enemie
214.
by chii 6mo ago
> people who don't agree with you to do things. the problem is that those people who don't agree with me are also not taking the externalized cost of non-action.
215.
by chii 6mo ago
This is the power of language. The bias is built into it.
216.
by chii 6mo ago
> Then the person who harmed him will be prosecuted ... NY Times isn’t calling for violence. And the negligent driver also didn't mean to cause injury, yet we have laws on negligent driving. If the NY Times would have known that har
217.
by chii 6mo ago
No, because those people are already public figures. They own companies that are publicly known (i don't mean publicly traded), and thus by proxy, are public face of those companies. Or they appear(ed) in public to make something of be
218.
by chii 6mo ago
Indeed, unless they're already a public person (such as celebrity or public figure of note).
219.
by chii 6mo ago
Yep. Exactly why i said > turn off these measures in a way that is undetectable. If you own the device, you ought to have the means to make such configuration/changes in undetectable ways. Otherwise, you don't truly own the dev
220.
by chii 6mo ago
It has their uses. If, for example, a company wants to issue fleet computers to workers or school to students, you want to have secure boot on those devices to prevent tampering. Secure boot makes it so that physical access is not the end a
221.
by chii 6mo ago
So you're saying that if people hadn't invented weapons, there would be no violence? The claim that AI is itself dangerous has no merit.
222.
by chii 6mo ago
> underlying threat posted by AI to society, the economy and human freedom persists I would deny that AI poses any such threat. There are actors who would use the tool in ways that threaten as you described, but that is a threat from sai
223.
by chii 6mo ago
Those who are concerned is implying that any new distribution mechanism is not going to favour them. And under the capitalist system, if nothing changes, the "new" distribution system is indeed not going to favour them - at best t
224.
by chii 6mo ago
Or, it might be the case that the prior regime had tactfully hidden all of those things being accused by the GP's comment, and this regime is simply doing it in the open with no regard.
225.
by chii 6mo ago
"but we can't trust the parents to protect the children!"
226.
by chii 6mo ago
The source is not just dna - that's just one type of architecture that exists. There might be others that operate on different instruction sets. The real source is mathematics. But some might say it's incomplete.
227.
by chii 6mo ago
Gold in hand is worth $15B in the bush?
228.
by chii 6mo ago
The first sentence is aspirational, while the second is describing current state.
229.
by chii 6mo ago
well, does this company have more than 2 layers of management? Why do you need that much for only 50 people, instead of enpowering those people to make choices (after training and providing guidance on what makes for a good choice in variou
230.
by chii 6mo ago
> using as much equipment as the gym policy allows. which said customer paid for. And now they want to back out of it because it turns out they thought users wouldn't do that. I say they ought to be punished by consumer competition
231.
by chii 6mo ago
> there is a wide distribution of actual use except when people start using openclaw, and the distribution narrows (to that of a power user). I hate companies that try to oversell capacity but hides it in the expected usage distribution.
232.
by chii 7mo ago
unfortunately, what you will find is that unless you get lucky, the next ship is more of the same. The system/management style is ingrained in corporate culture of large-ish companies (i would say if it has more than 2 layers of manage
233.
by chii 7mo ago
I'm just using it as a possible example. There's also tampermonkey which installs not via files but via urls from another site. The point is to call out the sensationalism in the title.
234.
by chii 7mo ago
it doesn't have to be files. it could be in memory on the browser. Extensions don't imply files for anyone but the most technical of conversations. Certainly not to the laymen. Having sensationalist titles should be called out at
235.
by chii 7mo ago
There's an implicit trust that a site doesn't try to racially profile you, as it is illegal. There's no enforcement, but that's why trust is being violated.
236.
by chii 7mo ago
but the language of "your computer" implies files on your computer, as it would be what people commonly call it. Merely just the extension is not enough. If it has the ability to scan your bookmarks, or visited site history, that
237.
by chii 7mo ago
> general electric releasing a frontend framework or toyota releasing a game engine: https://www.theverge.com/games/875995/toyota-fluorite-game-e...
238.
by chii 7mo ago
so you are merely just prejudiced against LLM generated content, even if it was good? Why not accept that it is good, and forget about it being LLM?
239.
by chii 7mo ago
how do you pipeline fertilizers?
240.
by chii 7mo ago
The victory was due to the people at home who protest and is politically against the war.

More ›