chii

4 ms·

1.
by chii 5d ago
> their economic dividend runs out i dont think it will - they still have a chokehold on battery production (which implies dominance in the EV sector), and they also control the vast majority of all rare earths. The chinese gov't ca
2.
by chii 6d ago
it's more likely that the stat for equipping is calculated differently to when unequipping (ala, "same" code in two different places, and one got modified at some point and forgot about the other).
3.
by chii 9d ago
Except the person doing the pooping doesn't drink from the same well as he's got his own private reserve supply.
4.
by chii 10d ago
> It does generally make sense that the OS vendor needs to play a key part in helping ensure trusted parties are involved in the supply chain. this position of privilege is what the OS vendor (google in this case) wants, because it spell
5.
by chii 11d ago
> Lower volume with consumers fully covering the device cost will probably become the norm dont know about lower volume, but having the consumer pay the cost of the device fully (instead of subsidized by the later sale of games on the sy
6.
by chii 11d ago
The VR world still has not produced a killer app. I had imagined that remote work would induce a VR desktop work environment (as the killer app), but that hadnt taken off at all (mostly, i think, because it's difficult to type and do k
7.
by chii 12d ago
There's no independent verification of what that checkbox actually does. The company can say anything, and you are unable to verify that they actually do it. The only verification you could do so far is GDPR-style data export, and also
8.
by chii 12d ago
The reason it works for churches is because the data told to churches are somewhat embarrassing for the confessor, and if leaked, will destroy the confessor's reputation (if not get into legal troubles). The data that google collects a
9.
by chii 13d ago
> lobbying against those laws. the original question was that the LLM creates extinction level event for mankind in order to lower emissions. I'm sure that no matter how the LLMs lobby, they cannot successfully lobby for a law (whic
10.
by chii 13d ago
> one should be held to a different standard than the other. harassing a worker is not the way to fix the problem. The worker has no agency to affect the changes desired by the harasser. It's an issue with the gov't, and needs
11.
by chii 13d ago
Why can't the LLM's be told/prompted to follow all relevant laws while it optimizes for a result?
12.
by chii 13d ago
> Monetarily, Nvidia is creating a lot of money in our economy. nvidia's money either comes from equity, or from debt. This means this money is "created" not from nothing, but from future commitments (ala, debt repayments,
13.
by chii 14d ago
> They're still autocomplete it's like saying our brain is just some chemical chain reactions. True, but also irrelevant.
14.
by chii 14d ago
> If a self improving model can't produce enough value to pay the electric bill then who cares? Unplug it. so you would unplug a child who hasn't shown their potential yet, simply because they don't produce enough value at
15.
by chii 15d ago
> without providing attribution or compensation? many teachers also taught many students over the course of history, and very few would eventually pay any compensation or even attribute their financial (or career) outcomes to the teacher
16.
by chii 15d ago
and people misuse this quote to justify unreasonable behaviour that does not progress the world.
17.
by chii 16d ago
> the greatest scientific minds if one has a scientific mind, they will accept evidence which may be contrary to their personal views. If you dont, you cannot be said to have a scientific mind, let alone greatest. > founding fathers o
18.
by chii 16d ago
I dont know any clinical information, but some (many, in fact) people assume mental illness when someone behaves in such a way that they believe their world view and mental model is absolute and fight to the last tooth and nail against any
19.
by chii 16d ago
> do no harm to humans? but you haven't specified _exactly_ what harm to humans mean. Would you consider the AI overlord to have harmed humans if they kept humans like we keep zoos today?
20.
by chii 17d ago
> copyright ownership is not a monopoly because there are other copyrighted works they are not fungible, unlike houses. Also, if you could copy a house like you could copy digital goods (i would download a car), i am also going to claim
21.
by chii 17d ago
> until the end of the author's life. which is too long, and also too short - what about authors who wrote finished their book on their deathbed? Then their rights are shorter than someone young - an unfair discrimination. That&#x27
22.
by chii 17d ago
> It you think copyright should be shorter to everyone, then inheriting something valuable shouldn't be a thing as well? inheritance has nothing to do with copyright. Financial assets are not monopolies. Copyright is only a valuable
23.
by chii 17d ago
forensic accounting and audits also require a paper trail. So if you have no logging and such, you will have already failed regulatory reporting standards - just like you would fail an accounting audit if you have no paper trail of where yo
24.
by chii 18d ago
> would have to be honestly reported for that idea to work. and why does this idea work for accounting audits, but not for security? As long as regulations for companies exist, they would necessarily follow it, and this would lead to rep
25.
by chii 18d ago
> pay their fortinet renewal and check "Security: Done!" without any kind of analysis. there exists objective measure of security, which would be some sort of hacks/breaches per period. If customers cared about it (and i a
26.
by chii 20d ago
> The world would be quite miserable if "perfectly legal" would be what everyone optimizes for. what you will find is that this is what corporations optimizes for. Therefore, you as a person, cannot compete with the corp. That&
27.
by chii 23d ago
> ICE is becoming a paramilitary force this is how the gestapo gets established.
28.
by chii 23d ago
> Google has probably the most and best code base among all tech companies but its Gemini is bad at coding. probably because google knows people would want to extract google's proprietary code from gemini if they use their own code
29.
by chii 24d ago
> In many cases people don’t switch to something else because there isn’t an alternative. no, they have an alternative - abstinence. And yet, large majority overwhelmingly chooses not to abstain. Therefore, it does not matter what they s
30.
by chii 25d ago
With each hellfire costing upwards of $150k per shot, it's not cost effective to use them to shoot down jammers

More ›