Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cheriot
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
181.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
Is any of the sociology research available publicly? Very curious what ya'll wanted to build.
182.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
The lawsuit calls out infinite scroll and notifications. To be fair, I've not read the entire thing. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.41... Whether we're regulating UI elements or a r
183.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> stop Meta from intentionally making their software addictive By regulating the existence of a 'next page' button? Curious if you can think of user interface rules that are less absurd.
184.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> due to play that same perpetual game of government regulation, industry self-policing, and boundary-testing. Does anyone think this stuff works, though? It's an cycle of outrage and performative regulation. I'm not sure the
185.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
I look forward to the absurd user interface rules that get proposed or even enshrined in federal regulation. It's an impossible task. Alternate path: attach electrodes to kids, measure dopamine levels, and turn off the app if they go t
186.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> with features like “infinite scroll” and persistent alerts used to hook young users > Meta has harnessed powerful and unprecedented technologies Are we talking about infinite scroll or heroine? It would make more sense to sue Kellog
187.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
Mostly direct employees here. Usually I'd think that's better, but ...
188.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
The place I work has physical security, baristas, and random other staff in an expensive city. Tbh I don't know what they make.
189.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
I LOL'd. Let's also remember that every tech company has middle and low wage jobs as well.
190.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
Employee claims supersede equity and debt holders. The question is whether the company shuts down with money in the bank or keeps running until it's out. People should remember the board and CEO for screwing over employees.
191.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
If people can't own a home do they cease to exist? Weird how "overpopulating" comes up when discussing homes for people that are here already, but not other issues like jobs or office construction.
192.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> free market economics > nor do I want to live in a community that has ADUs Would you rather have a free market or a local land use committee to forbid ADUs?
193.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
Part of the political problem is people voting against any form of housing they don't want for themselves. What's degrading is people on the street because CA has such an extreme housing shortage.
194.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
It's an odd political outcome, but serves as a model for other housing shapes. The state defined specific things a city has to approve and a timeline they have to approve it in. Poof, we have ~100,000 new homes and a cottage industry b
195.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> a free market Housing supply is not a free market. At least in the US, there's a committee reviewing each parcel deciding how many sqft of interior space, how many kitchens, how tall, and what uses.
196.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
The limiting factor in population is the ability to construct housing? Growth in the developed countries with housing shortages keeps getting revised down.
197.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> And given that `Method` is either one of a few predefined constants The compiler via a method call or parameter can capture this constraint in a pretty straight forward way. I'm not sure why an API would give that up
198.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
I meant headset sales since I've never been able to find actual usage numbers. Afaict, on usage, everyone is guessing.
199.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
Quest 2 grew the VR market by ~10x. What was the killer app? Beat Saber is the first install, but not what kept it going for 3 years. It's the ecosystem. VR Chat for some, social game for others, immersive experiments like Bonelab, and
200.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
There's a lot of precedence for regulating commerce based on who owns the company and what country the owner is in.
201.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
Companies have a steady flow of early career people that need mentoring. It's not just one time
202.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
What are some examples of employee purchased businesses?
203.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
In addition to inventories like other commenters mention, remember this is a capital intensive business. When chip makers collectively add more capacity than is needed, prices drop (ie revenue drops). It could also be "normalizing"
204.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
I'd phrase it as: ruby, python, and javascript created a generation of programmers that didn't know how to use a type system. When they needed something more light weight and performant, they migrated to the language with the most
205.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
My understanding is that it only applies to foreign entities. Still overly broad, but a far cry from the claims of censorship.
206.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> The press is any medium that a citizen of the US is expressing themselves through. So everyone is the press and any product used to speak cannot be regulated? This country has regulated TV broadcast and radio for longer than I've
207.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
I mean, short form video is available on YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook and those are just the ones I know about. How is having one less option impacting someone's ability to speak? "People use a product t
208.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
> The Restrict Act basically allows the US to impose Chinese-level censorship across the "Western" internet and persecute any one in the US who helps circumvent the censorship. This statement is at least as misleading as the &q
209.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
I've actually gotten a decent number of responses and yours is the only insult so far. Not too shabby for the internet. The law is heavily based on precedent. Seems like a big difference between speech and a specific communication mech
210.
▲
by
cheriot
3y ago
TikTok, like any other product with user driven content is using Section 230 to disavow responsibility for the content on their app. If it's not TikTok's speech how can they claim the first amendment? The users speaking can just a
More ›