chase-seibert

3 ms·

1.
by chase-seibert 7y ago
This decision makes sense from the perspective of the person who owns doing database migrations, or who owns the performance of the database. However, the other 99% of the engineers in the company end up dealing with the fallout of not havi
2.
by chase-seibert 7y ago
I've done both roles, but my sense is that manager of managers is essentially a more risky role -- chances of being laid off are higher, with accompanying risk. Line managers virtually never get laid off. Compensation seems similar, as
3.
by chase-seibert 8y ago
I’ve build a similar tool for a hackathon. What we found when we rolled this out to the whole company was that as soon as they saw the data for other people, they stopped worrying that we had a culture of too many meetings.
4.
by chase-seibert 12y ago
ES6 admittedly borrowed a lot from Python. I just wish Guido had been successful getting Python supported as a first class language in Chrome; that might have actually given us a choice in the browser. Even then, I find it hard to imagine t
5.
by chase-seibert 12y ago
Certainly a number of common interactions are not currently possible (or at least not optimal) without being able to use JS. Maybe some day we can get to a place with web components where many of those common patterns can be implemented wit
6.
by chase-seibert 12y ago
+1 I think that React.js is actually a much better model, closer to how you would render full page renders on the server.
7.
by chase-seibert 12y ago
I agree. I value what javascript enables for those experience as well. I just wish more sites could implement those useful pieces and still get all the basic interactions correct. Too often, those are broken, I assume due to ignorance.