catshirt

16 ms·

91.
by catshirt 10y ago
yep definitely. and there is definitely a cost and effort required to make Electron feel as good as native. depending on your feature requirements, this can get really hairy. i'm just exhausted by the "web apps feel so much worse
92.
by catshirt 10y ago
seriously. and skype is a grand example of how shitty a native client can be. tired of this argument. if you put in the proper effort, your users won't care or notice.
93.
by catshirt 10y ago
great analogy. also does a good job pointing out the type of vagueness and subjectivity in meaning that makes it hard to pin down consciousness. the vagueness- which parts can you remove from a car before you wouldn't call it a car any
94.
by catshirt 10y ago
for our purposes, to solve is to understand. is there a single physical process or entity we can attribute consciousness to? our high level understanding of consciousness is that it at some point emerges from physical processes. this emerge
95.
by catshirt 10y ago
a name of any person or paper which claims to have solved consciousness is probably sufficient.
96.
by catshirt 10y ago
just because these things can conceive consciousness does not make them consciousness. unless you can tell me exactly why and when in these processes consciousness arises, were not having the same conversation.
97.
by catshirt 10y ago
we're on the same page. and you shine some light on OPs point that I now see more truth to- poetry parading as science.
98.
by catshirt 10y ago
good point! I just don't want the false positives to discourage us from trying to share our feelings just because it's difficult.
99.
by catshirt 10y ago
"I think it's well understood how consciousness works" care to expand on this at all? it completely contradicts most everything I've heard. saying consciousness is just a neural reaction could be right but it's by n
100.
by catshirt 10y ago
I'm reminded of people talking about tripping. we don't really have the vocabulary or knowledge to talk about certain things and they end up sounding wishywashy. but I don't think it means we can't try, or hypothesize...
101.
by catshirt 10y ago
i'm not saying it has to be true, but there is more incentive to create a fresh account to post that information than there is incentive to lie about it.
102.
by catshirt 10y ago
can someone fact check this?
103.
by catshirt 10y ago
care to share your position and some discreet information about the company (size, industry?)
104.
by catshirt 10y ago
i'm less concerned with what "looks" easier than what's actually easier. i just can't convince myself "it looks less scary" is worthy of the technical tradeoffs (for me, at the very least).
105.
by catshirt 10y ago
"The fact that Glimmer templates are "just HTML" makes them accessible to people like designers who may not understand all of the fancy destructuring or array mapping happening in your JSX." isn't this like, at leas
106.
by catshirt 10y ago
you got the question backwards. if enough subjects don't care about confidentiality you could use only them and publish the data.
107.
by catshirt 10y ago
hm. well, i can't argue. i'm not the expert on the aliens we haven't found yet.
108.
by catshirt 10y ago
seemed like joke not a criticism. I laughed.
109.
by catshirt 10y ago
no, don't, please. programming is a means to an end. programming is fun the same way long division by hand is fun. i can't wait for the robots to release me from the monotony.
110.
by catshirt 10y ago
> For a few years I followed SC2's e-sports scene, but my interest slowly died out. if it's any consolation your interest died with the game. :( still one of the greatest games of all time. just always had a hard time finding
111.
by catshirt 10y ago
hm. i think we're seeing eye to eye. you seem more willing to speculate but that is not an offense. the only points i wanted to make are: 1. first amendment does not mean you can say or do whatever you wish 2. if the we can assume the
112.
by catshirt 10y ago
to get this out of the way: if he lied, that is a completely different subject. nor is it for us to judge. nor am i interested in speculating. > It's not reasonable to introduce additional first amendment restrictions or award damag
113.
by catshirt 10y ago
hi Michael, thanks! considering the 1% rule, do you think our culture of media consumption is in our nature or something we've created? is it a trend? do you think there will be more room in the future for companies that serve amateur
114.
by catshirt 10y ago
> He was a 'junior operator' in a computer room .. you know, in the good ol' days, where the computers lived. (Before they escaped and attached themselves to your wrists.) i hope one day i can tell a story like you. that i
115.
by catshirt 10y ago
my point is simply that many types of expression and speech are not protected by the first amendment. period. there is nothing contradictory or ironic of a journalist challenging the first amendment in court. break it down this way: some gu
116.
by catshirt 10y ago
> "challenge the first amendment" sorry, what? i don't think assault is protected by the first amendment. at the risk of sounding naive i have to ask why Manson wasn't protected under the first amendment?
117.
by catshirt 10y ago
i was just hating on GitLab here a few days ago so i will take the opportunity to say this is really cool on a bunch of levels.
118.
by catshirt 10y ago
what is a "slider toggle"? sliders should be used for ranges of values. checkbox for toggling values. we could argue it's unfortunate that iOS(?) decided to start making their "checkboxes" look a little like sliders
119.
by catshirt 10y ago
well that's just the most obscure date format i think i've ever seen ? ;)
120.
by catshirt 10y ago
1. if you've let it go on for months you can probably afford to wait A Little Longer. 2. because everything is relative i take "for months" to mean "for a dangerously long time". and this is what i mean by cutting y

More ›