hm. i think we're seeing eye to eye. you seem more willing to speculate but that is not an offense. the only points i wanted to make are: 1. first amendment do

hm. i think we're seeing eye to eye. you seem more willing to speculate but that is not an offense. the only points i wanted to make are: 1. first amendment does not mean you can say or do whatever you wish 2. if the we can assume the facts are correct, the guy should be punished accordingly which, if i understand correctly, are two points you'd not even disagree with, barring any new evidence.