capr

5 ms·

1.
by capr 2mo ago
Most likely increase, despite your intuition. This argument has been debunked so many times both intellectually and empirically. For one, read "Against Intellectual Property" by Stephan Kinsella.
2.
by capr 2mo ago
Because people want to discover if a law is principled, and "certain scale" is not a principle, is just an arbitrary utilitarian distinction.
3.
by capr 2mo ago
> Should I imagine that all architects have done nothing their entire life? Well this is awkard...
4.
by capr 2mo ago
libertarian socialism is an oxymoron
5.
by capr 3mo ago
> It’s not technically a tax. Taxes produce valuable public benefits, like medical research and parks. This is simply legal theft. An economist would not read past this first sentence.
6.
by capr 3mo ago
...allocated on not fixing the bugs, sure. and AI does not decide what you spend your time on.
7.
by capr 3mo ago
performance specialist, really?
8.
by capr 3mo ago
Strawman - it wasn't arbitrary at all.
9.
by capr 3mo ago
I think "Good thing that is not your problem." includes inability to do such a thing.
10.
by capr 3mo ago
Likewise for you following them blindly.
11.
by capr 4mo ago
It doesn't require that at all, on the contrary. Why don't you educate yourself on these basic assumptions?
12.
by capr 4mo ago
That analogy works for app code, it doesn't work for technologies, library, frameworks, algorithms. Why build a compiler for this app? YAGNI! makes no sense.
13.
by capr 4mo ago
Yup, because perfect competition is fundamentally the same as the salary cap, except for companies instead of employees. Specialization leads to natural monopolies at company level just as it does at personal level. Besides, the term monopo
14.
by capr 4mo ago
but that's not what they're doing. that's just you believing the rhetoric
15.
by capr 4mo ago
so the doctors acted just like the LLM
16.
by capr 5mo ago
That smells a lot like Facebook making a php compiler
17.
by capr 6mo ago
He made an economic argument that went straight over your head.
18.
by capr 6mo ago
I personally love how AI shows through sheer indifference how the whole concept of intellectual property is completely incoherent.
19.
by capr 8mo ago
> Do you disagree that this person followed the law, and that politicians enacted those laws, and that we voted for these politicians? This is the definition of brainwashing. You had a false choice between person A and person B who are m
20.
by capr 10mo ago
I don't believe any of this.
21.
by capr 11mo ago
"due to voters making bad choices" ahahahahahaha
22.
by capr 11mo ago
way to prove his point
23.
by capr 11mo ago
Maybe if they would've let their engineers use Borland C++ they would've learned a thing or two for their own product.
24.
by capr 1y ago
And that's about the only type of visa where that happens.
25.
by capr 1y ago
try it, like these people https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7iJDMU43iUk
26.
by capr 2y ago
But profit _is_ the driving force of human action. Doing anything voluntarily is by definition profitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it.
27.
by capr 2y ago
there's absolutely something wrong with the fruits of their labor though, which I am forced to use every day
28.
by capr 2y ago
not true at all, only socialists think that (I'm also from Europe where everybody and their dog's a socialist)
29.
by capr 2y ago
compared to what? most doctors never heard of Bayes rule
30.
by capr 2y ago
There are no core tenants of democracy other than majority rule. The actions you listed (with the exception of canceling elections) do not actually destroy the ability for the majority to rule. In fact, one common tactic of democratic state

More ›