buzer

38 ms·

451.
by buzer 9y ago
I haven't tried it myself, but I guess one option would be to use DHCPv6 with low lifetime timers? That way router could stop advertising the prefix from upstream that no longer works.
452.
by buzer 9y ago
New MM SFP+s are $16 from fs.com, SM is about double (for 220m, 2km and 10km optics). These days I honestly wouldn't recommend going with multimode for anything new. Use twinax for short distances (e.g. server to ToR) and SM for everyt
453.
by buzer 10y ago
That doesn't sound correct. Are you absolutely sure you aren't also getting a prefix delegation thru DHCPv6? That's currently the common way to provide IPv6 connectivity currently for residential users. From what I remember h
454.
by buzer 10y ago
Well, I guess most of the countries do "pay", but at least in Finland that pay is 5.10 euros per day for first half of year (increases first to 8.50 for days 165-256 and then to 11.90 for remaining). If someone other entity was pa
455.
by buzer 10y ago
So you cannot access the portal page that quite a few more or less public wifi networks require you to access in order to gain internet access?
456.
by buzer 10y ago
Reminds me of "Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds
457.
by buzer 10y ago
Isn't that cloaking which is against Google's webmaster guidelines? https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66355?hl=en [EDIT] Apparently they have added "First click free" policy https:&
458.
by buzer 10y ago
It's risky for browsers to do it automatically since it's not something that sites are excepting. Some might be using different certificates on different servers for same domain for example. It's possible for sites to instruc
459.
by buzer 10y ago
It also provides 1Tbps of aggregated bandwidth (in form of multiple 40Gbps interfaces). According to FAQ, billing starts when it leaves AWS DC and ends after data ingestion is complete. So roughly minimum (list) price (1 day transit one-way
460.
by buzer 10y ago
There are cases where IP blacklists are pretty much the only option you have. For example, in the case of webhooks, what would you whitelist? You cannot whitelist anything that user provides without manual approval (which can be huge overhe
461.
by buzer 10y ago
> How many IoT devices need to allow incoming connections at all? And how many connections do they need to make? If they need outgoing connections, they likely also need incoming when we are speaking about stateless filtering. Without in
462.
by buzer 10y ago
If you are running 1-2 of copies or applications that very large amount of memory while being pretty small themselves, not much (and that's admittedly pretty common). However, if you, for example, need to run 20x copies of 50MB applica
463.
by buzer 10y ago
Technically, yes. Submitters swear that their requests are valid under penalty of perjury. Nah. Perjury only applies to the part where they need to swear that the sender is authorized to act on behalf of the allegedly infringed work.
464.
by buzer 10y ago
What if you just implemented simple DRM? As we have seen, it apparently isn't illegal to disable access to something you have paid for, let alone something you haven't.