Technically, yes. Submitters swear that their requests are valid under penalty of perjury. Nah. Perjury only applies to the part where they need to swear that

Technically, yes. Submitters swear that their requests are valid under penalty of perjury. Nah. Perjury only applies to the part where they need to swear that the sender is authorized to act on behalf of the allegedly infringed work. ``(vi) A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. There is a "good faith belief" requirement, but I don't think that part has ever been tested in court, so I have no clue what count as "good faith belief" in reality and if there are any actual penalties involved. https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/2281/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/2281...