bullsandabears

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bullsandabears 7y ago

   Here's a list of various config changes to improve Intellij performance. These were just cobbled together and I have a feeling the JVM settings are out of date, so any updates or suggestions or links to better pages would be welcome.
2. 2.▲
   by bullsandabears 7y ago

   I'm also a huge fan of JetBrains products and how they work together. It's at the point where I'm thinking of slogans for them, like 'At JetBrains, the E in IDE stands for experience'... or maybe 'ecosystem&#x
3. 3.▲
   by bullsandabears 8y ago

   There are multiple ways to vastly increase Intellij performance. They also have 'Auto-share Settings' feature so you can keep a whole team in-sync with them through a repo. tweaks like: - they added their own custom property that
4. 4.▲
   by bullsandabears 9y ago

   This clickbait headline is leaning on a study behind a paywall so we can't argue the actual points or data. Don't bother
5. 5.▲
   by bullsandabears 9y ago

   Thanks for clarifying this and your info on Burp's capabilities above. What are some of the commercial options you just mentioned? I'm dealing with a large app not written with C but does have API endpoints over http. For a s
6. 6.▲
   by bullsandabears 9y ago

   Big thanks for this reply. I was looking to cut through all the noise you mentioned. I'm finding all I was looking for in the Radamsa readme for starting and next steps. Use cases expressed in unix pipes > clear_as_day.txt. Fuzz
7. 7.▲
   by bullsandabears 9y ago

   Does anyone know of a list of categorized and recommended fuzzers for different purposes, or just more specifically for smart fuzzing web API's and how to get started with it? Search results for this kind of stuff are hard to parse ca
8. 8.▲
   by bullsandabears 9y ago

   In either the day-to-day or 'team-building' events, does anyone have office cultures with a consciously positive attitude to 'shy' people? I think the whole subtext and title of this article shows the ignorant extrovert&
9. 9.▲
   by bullsandabears 10y ago

   I agree on the bigger question. I thought I was communicating the lack of random samples, but I appreciate you pointing out why just referencing the sample size is not good enough in a sense. Anyways, they practically required lack of ran
10. 10.▲
    by bullsandabears 10y ago

    This is what passes as science in 'scientific american'?! There's not a single absolute number reported aside from the laughingly small sample size of 400 adults in a world of 7,000,000,000.
11. 11.▲
    by bullsandabears 10y ago

    Your wondering why was just answered succinctly in the comment you posted your reply to: > There were some ISPs which were selling people's data prior to this order (Verizon was one, IIRC, and a few others were actively injecting ad
12. 12.▲
    by bullsandabears 10y ago

    I have to add there is zero reverse-engineering here. The main purpose of this article seems to be name-dropping for the 500M company while trying to generate some 'thoughtleader'-cred