Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bryant
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
151.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
You could probably still do it. It'd just have to be a distillation system that's not explicitly branded as a countertop water distiller but still describes its function and effects as such. You see plenty of examples of this on t
152.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
Is it gonna be good enough for Tesla to own and insure-for liability?
153.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
It'd be very surprising if this wasn't arranged as part of a rule 10b5-1 plan, but absent any other information, there's nothing to suggest that this was anything but. ( https://www.investopedia.com/terms/
154.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
In fairness, everyone probably likes to point to that because it was one of the primary conclusions reached by investigative journalist Peter Robison in the book "Flying Blind."
155.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
Speculating: Heat (within reason) encourages plant growth provided the other ingredients are there. Plant growth shows up through this luminescence. If a lack of rain can be projected, then the drawdown of ground water can now also be more
156.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
It's a neat concept, although I imagine this'll be a cat and mouse endeavor that escalates very quickly. So, a suggestion - apply to the Open Technology Fund's Rapid Response Fund. I'd probably request the following in
157.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
Ten bucks says hunger and reward center actuation are deeply intertwined, and these interesting outcomes of GLP-1 agonists are how we're figuring that out.
158.
▲
by
bryant
2y ago
If you're keen on reading about the technique, the nature source ( https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-024-02266-z ) is paywalled. Arxiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.05311
159.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
LearnXinYminutes says "Want to add your favorite language to the list? Head on over to Github[1] and send a pull request!" Right at the very bottom. Sounds like a great opportunity for you to contribute. Especially since the work
160.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
In fairness, perfect and simple almost never go hand in hand in life critical applications because simple is almost entirely incapable of accounting for and mitigating impacts from the entropy of the universe. Couple that with capitalism (t
161.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
You're overstressing. Open the page. Let the article load. Enter reader mode. Doesn't matter if you weren't fast enough. Once in reader mode, if it rendered the paywall in reader mode, just refresh. --- This at least works on
162.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
I mean, I imagine the risks from insider threats (selling or dumping secrets etc) would be heightened in this environment. Especially if two layoffs already happened. They'd need to have a bulletproof insider threat program, one they&#
163.
▲
Adobe Atmosphere (2001)
(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points
by
bryant
3y ago
|
1 comments
164.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
The fact that this is necessary is wild.
165.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
> Open Source Initiative is not an authority here. We had this debate many many times. You may not agree with this point of view, but let's not make it as if yours is the universal one. It practically is, and they've done a go
166.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
> Maybe my tech-illiterate boomer mom who would ask google to find a file on her desktop called product.zip but is that a case we want to optimize our TLDs for? What percentage of the population is tech-illiterate? maybe a single-digit p
167.
▲
by
bryant
3y ago
> Even in Manhattan, getting a taxi at 2am was a crap shoot. I can an Uber in the suburbs at 2am anywhere in the country. You certainly can call an uber, yes. Whether they come through or whether they find a suitable reason to cancel on
168.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
BISO and CISO are generally not the same. A BISO function tends to be an interface between information security and business units.
169.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
You'd be surprised how often this happens though. I've seen all the following structures: CISO -> COO -> CEO CISO -> CIO -> COO -> CEO CISO -> CSO -> COO -> CEO CISO -> CLO -> CEO CISO -> CLO ->
170.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
> Why do you get to make that determination? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance I'm not making the determination. It's the only logical one to make if we're to live in a society that v
171.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
Good examples of self accountability? Sadly not. (Edit: see huffmsa for a good example) Good examples of accountability to the board? All over. But boards care (by mandate) only about profit unless specified otherwise. There's no incen
172.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
They know what accountability is. That's why they never use the word. Yeah we know you're responsible for it, but how are you being held accountable for it? No one will remember in two years time, but my hope is it'll fac
173.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
Although Gwynne Shotwell manages day to day ops at SpaceX in her role as COO (including executing existing strategy), it's likely she's driving new strategy with Elon's decisionmaking where relevant, so she's essential
174.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
> To be fair, most (the vast majority) of people I know in gen z I know works significantly less hard than my parents did, I did, etc. Any possibility this perceived "less-hard" working is an effect rather than a cause? > Th
175.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
Nope lol it's most closely relatable to a product recall/repair.
176.
▲
How rare is a Supreme Court breach? Very rare
(politico.com)
102 points
by
bryant
4y ago
|
309 comments
177.
▲
by
bryant
4y ago
> This sounds like a poetic way of justifying the pretense of tolerance while not actually being that, and using it as a symbol to mask the same behavior it is on the surface condemning. This sounds like a handwavey dismissal of a well
178.
▲
by
bryant
5y ago
It seems like Paul is confusing intolerance of intolerance with heresy in this essay. Further reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance Expression of just about anything is met with fairly minimal con
179.
▲
by
bryant
5y ago
Indeed, we're basically watching the real-time implosion of a super-power (if Russia could've been called that), and Chinese institutions will own just about every bit of intangible (and soon tangible) infrastructure that matters.
180.
▲
by
bryant
5y ago
> War is war. That is the analogy, If you do not see that there is nothing more to say. Just because we are "the bigger bully" in a circumstance that is ok? Repeating: Though the support should certainly be there for all people
More ›