breppp

42 ms·

751.
by breppp 1y ago
I don't know how Iran feels about the west, but I for one am not keen about them hanging homosexuals on cranes, cutting hands of thieves, raping protestors in prison or taking random european tourist number 300 hostage in order to make
752.
by breppp 1y ago
I don't understand what's the difference if Italy develops its own or buys it from somewhere else. Comparably, phone tapping equipment is being sold world wide for almost a century and is used similarly The fact that some countrie
753.
by breppp 1y ago
That is not the same company, and as I said above, you expect something else from Italy compared to the Saudis
754.
by breppp 1y ago
That's a long shot from understanding "what the US is funding", because one company backed by a US VC sold the Italians something they misused. Concerning why this happened, you seem to know exactly why this happened. I for o
755.
by breppp 1y ago
However, the fact that companies sell offensive cyber warfare software to governments is not new, and that specific company isn't either. There's also nothing inherently wrong with selling intelligence tools to a western governmen
756.
by breppp 1y ago
It's amazing that US and Israel are the only countries mentioned in the headline While the story itself is about Italy spying on a journalist in another EU country But I guess news sites needs them clicks
757.
by breppp 1y ago
i didn't say it isn't real security, this is going to definitely be a major field. However, currently these attacks are all some variation on "ignore previous instructions", and taking the language of fields where the le
758.
by breppp 1y ago
it uses all the jargon from real security (spraying, scope violation, bypass) but when reading these, it always sounds simple like essentially prompt injection, rather than some highly crafted shell code and unsafe memory exploitation
759.
by breppp 1y ago
good thing the good old belgians know how to spot a genocide in africa
760.
by breppp 1y ago
This kind of literary genre is popular these days and it always ends with being surprised that actions have consequences
761.
by breppp 1y ago
https://archive.md/Atn11
762.
by breppp 1y ago
I think generally terrorism has some other connotations which is why this is raising antagonism among Ukraine supporters I don't think this is causing fear as the citizens do not feel threatened, as these are military targets. I think
763.
by breppp 1y ago
But that can be said for most actions in a war. Multiple actions taken together is what changes the course of a war Giving one example, you could imagine that for internal reasons, the Russians must keep a facade of a war that is far away,
764.
by breppp 1y ago
I think that's overly semantic, and if the US government is actively pressuring governments (Israel) to transfer batteries, and is doing refurbishing of those batteries, then that's a good evidence of some policy. I do agree that
765.
by breppp 1y ago
interesting, thanks!
766.
by breppp 1y ago
Russian propaganda and leaders surely tried to drive that idea forward from day-one of the war. However, three years later, I think we can summarize they highly miscalculated that the west would not intervene because of fear of nuclear war.
767.
by breppp 1y ago
Don't have a horse in this race, but I don't understand your quote, it does back OP claims. These allies need agreement from the US government to transfer these systems to Ukraine. Some like Israel, probably transferred these to U
768.
by breppp 1y ago
Any recommended reading by Lakoff on the subject?
769.
by breppp 1y ago
Yes but arguably, MAD is currently more relevant between the US and China. Given the economic/international stance of Russia for the past three decades and the maintenance level of their armed forces, their ability to execute a first-s
770.
by breppp 1y ago
> Note: US Embassies, where interviews are often conducted, are still considered US soil subject to US laws (otherwise the latest declaration from Trump pausing them would not apply to them) I don't think that's how it works. T
771.
by breppp 1y ago
So it doesn't apply to people that are applying for visa status?
772.
by breppp 1y ago
If you want to be overly semantic it only talks about freedom of assembly for the "people", which as you defined above might refer to "the people of the united states" Also, going through social account history is not on
773.
by breppp 1y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q="powered+by+vbulletin"
774.
by breppp 1y ago
I've read the article and it didn't seem to me the author is suggesting loops
775.
by breppp 1y ago
and you can easily prompt ai to use a hyphen lowercase, spelling and style is still an indication of human writing
776.
by breppp 1y ago
spelling and grammar mistakes
777.
by breppp 1y ago
The story is currently one sided because it makes a lot of sense. You got someone who is known to "fight against the man" in an an anti-social way, that has self proclaimed anti-capitalist tendencies, and that joins the ultimate i
778.
by breppp 1y ago
That's a good question, VC pressure and hope for first mover advantage? The humane launch video features two founders that look like they were forced to participate by their hostage takers
779.
by breppp 1y ago
I believe that if this would happen in a normal court case this would end in mistrial. It is not true that this must be in favor of Israel, a criminal that tries to prevent his trial by influencing witnesses, could also try to influence the
780.
by breppp 1y ago
Regarding the prosecutor, it did affect the case 1. The allegations were revealed just before the arrest warrants were released 2. The arrest warrants were rushed, brushing aside valid concerns (the court later decided it was unlawful) 3. T

More ›