boxed

27 ms·

601.
by boxed 1y ago
Hmm, I don't think that's correct. The single "Gone" has written "IOMMI" on it, but I think that's a design flourish mostly. There is an artist named "IOMMI" on Spotify though: https:/&#x2F
602.
by boxed 1y ago
The docs has a lot of examples, especially the cookbook. For example: https://docs.iommi.rocks/cookbook_tables.html In the docs, if you click on the links "forms" or "tables", that will lead to the docs
603.
by boxed 1y ago
The idea would be to support both transparently.
604.
by boxed 1y ago
Monty Python was at the time a group of people (seems worse than a single person), and afaik also a trademark (also seems worse). But yea, maybe Python made a legal gamble that just happened to work out. I am not a lawyer :shrug:
605.
by boxed 1y ago
Maybe I'm confused. Which law would you presume was violated? Did Django violate the same law when it was named Django? Did Python violate that same law?
606.
by boxed 1y ago
> [flask] in the test requirements Good point. I've removed it. Thanks. > [iommi for flask possible] The HTTP parts are super easy, it's the ORM mapping support that is the big issue. When I made an attempt first time SQLAlc
607.
by boxed 1y ago
I mean.. there are a lot of people with that name, and it's an homage.
608.
by boxed 1y ago
Hmm.. flask shouldn't be a dependency. I tried to get iommi to work on flask/sqlalchemy many years ago, but that's somewhat abondoned... > I am thinking about using it for some sections (a management/dashboard bit, an
609.
by boxed 1y ago
It can. But it doesn't necessarily mean that. Or maybe it means you CAN work around it, but it's cumbersome/bad to do so. Imo the Django Admin is like that: lots of ad-hoc and random customization options and lots of missing
610.
by boxed 1y ago
I understand that gut feeling. I've worked with many such systems. iommi is not like that though, because we HATE systems that have a nice two line demo but then immediately falls apart. We consider any failure to scale up customizatio
611.
by boxed 1y ago
Stopped changing yes. Honestly the "death" of Elm might be the best thing that happened to it, at least considering the disaster that was 0.18->0.19.
612.
by boxed 1y ago
More information and back story can be found on my blog: https://kodare.net/tags.html#iommi We've worked on this since 2014.
613.
by boxed 1y ago
Plus most of iommi is written while listening to Heaven & Hell and Mob Rules on repeat :P
614.
by boxed 1y ago
Django backend. By default bootstrap as CSS framework but we ship with finished implementations for many more. Dynamic behavior is mostly limited to pagination and filtering on tables, which is just some plain JS with fetch(). Oh, and forei
615.
by boxed 1y ago
In Elm the UI is 100% pure, and they are super adamant that local state is evil and a mistake. They sort of get away with it because there is already hidden state like input focus/selection, or scroll positions. But it's pretty cl
616.
by boxed 1y ago
> Instead, you are just simply an ideological fan of his, so no matter how many times he gets proven wrong, its not going to change your mind about him. That's just you repeating confirmation bias again. I am not an ideological fan
617.
Iommi – your first pick for a Django power chord(iommi.rocks)
63 points by boxed 1y ago|57 comments
618.
by boxed 1y ago
My bad. Still. My point stands.
619.
by boxed 1y ago
No, the US got to the moon because it cared about engineering and science more than ideology (although MacCarthyr made a good attempt at screwing that up).
620.
by boxed 1y ago
> I don't need to go watch it. The definition of confirmation bias right there.
621.
by boxed 1y ago
You haven't watched the interview on Everyday Astronaut I see. You should go watch it.
622.
by boxed 1y ago
> Look, I'm all for better battery technology Go on. > but we are also building a ton of mini bombs that we all hold in our pockets Yea. That's the definition of "battery". Clearly you are against batteries.
623.
by boxed 1y ago
This "monopoly" isn't a monopoly at all first of all. ULA and afaik even RocketLab are winning contracts, and SLS is still actually a thing. The "monopoly" you are complaining about IS the competition. SpaceX litera
624.
by boxed 1y ago
I'm doing it because you are failing to do so. Blatantly.
625.
by boxed 1y ago
Everyone keeps saying Musk is just handwaving and not an engineer. Why can't we make the same argument about von Braun? The proof is always handwaving, so I don't see how it's different.
626.
by boxed 1y ago
Come now. Are you really saying that this is a lie: > The nice thing is, if you’ve got friends in different cities and they’re playing the same game, you can both go online at the same time and play the game together even though you’re i
627.
by boxed 1y ago
> Considering their contract just went back up for grabs I’m not sure how true that statement is. SpaceX is far and away the most credible contractor. And it's not even close. > This was unnecessary and patronizing And yet, you s
628.
by boxed 1y ago
Lamenting it why though? Because it's sad that other space companies are shit? Yea ok. I can get behind it. Because you dislike Elon and would rather see the US space program turn to shit than allow Elon to get a symbolic win? Then I&#
629.
by boxed 1y ago
And yet, no other rocket company has done anything close. And no other car company has made such radical differences in the market as Tesla. Again: you must be able to keep two things in your head at once. I understand that Elon is an absol
630.
by boxed 1y ago
I mean.. Werner von Braun wasn't just "sort of a Nazi if you squint real hard", but an ACTUAL Nazi. At some point you need to focus on getting the job done, and not on purity tests and struggle sessions. THAT is why the US on

More ›