boringuser2

42 ms·

511.
by boringuser2 4y ago
Nobody likes to talk about the effect of moving large populations around globally without the housing infrastructure to support them.
512.
by boringuser2 4y ago
You're right, it kind of makes me think AGI won't come about from LLMs.
513.
by boringuser2 4y ago
What's up with all of these crazy technical developments after a period of relative stagnation? Aside from it being merely random or selection bias, it's plausible that there's some kind of AI assist beyond what we know happe
514.
by boringuser2 4y ago
This parody will no longer be sustainable when the models can understand subtlety and intent. GPT-4 is already much better than GPT-3.5 at this.
515.
by boringuser2 4y ago
These models simply won't require monitoring by a "healthcare professional" in 2-3 generations, they literally will be the healthcare professionals.
516.
by boringuser2 4y ago
At this point it seems like simply cedeing computing to AI and reentering the real world might be the way to go.
517.
by boringuser2 4y ago
Look at where your failure lies here -- you literally just asserted your biases as "good" and said you failed to see another perspective. That's literally the point.
518.
by boringuser2 4y ago
This statement is incredibly biased -- dripping with it: "Are your computational models, data, and frameworks reflecting or amplifying existing bias, or assumptions resulting in biased or discriminatory outcomes, or have outsized impac
519.
by boringuser2 4y ago
These goalposts keep evolving.
520.
by boringuser2 4y ago
Do you really see commensurate potential harm between an extreme scenario and a mundane one? The development of AGI is an extreme, extreme scenario.
521.
by boringuser2 4y ago
Why?
522.
by boringuser2 4y ago
If someone puts a gun to your head, what harm has been done? Well, the potential harm is only deniable by the biggest of shills, but, technically, the only harm is psychological.
523.
by boringuser2 4y ago
GPT-4 is basically magic when it comes to code. Have you used it?
524.
by boringuser2 4y ago
It's a terrible argument. The harm is transparent and greatly eclipses most other threats to cybersecurity.
525.
by boringuser2 4y ago
These models are nakedly dangerous, even a cursory glance suggests this.
526.
by boringuser2 4y ago
I'm not sure why this was necessary. If you bet big and lose, of course you should hold the bag.
527.
by boringuser2 4y ago
It is interesting to me that all of these labor cuts are from companies vastly outperforming the stock market.
528.
by boringuser2 4y ago
Isn't it interesting that we are probably going to be annihilated by AI and there's basically nothing we can do about it, because we can't predict its emergence or suppress the incentives to develop it? I want to know greatly