3 ms·

Look at where your failure lies here -- you literally just asserted your biases as "good" and said you failed to see another perspective. That's literally the

• sgift 4y ago
  I didn't fail to see another perspective. I rejected the other positions as worse (after careful examination). That's different. Also, neutrality is for the most part just a status quo bias. "Things are good as they are" is a position as much as every other.
  • none_to_remain 4y ago
    Zero distinction between "is" and "ought"
• kokanee 4y ago
  Your point seems to be that AI output should not be moderated. This would mean that the AI would adopt whatever biases and language patterns exist in the training data. In that scenario, the AI developer is still injecting bias by selecting which training data to use. There's also the problem that any unmoderated AI would be completely commercially unviable, of course. So, I think I understand what you're opposed to, but I'm curious what actions/methodologies you would be in favor of.