boolemancer

8 ms·

31.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> No because the primary use of Linux is not piracy. Whereas for emulation it is. It's not piracy to play a game that you've backed up on different hardware than the original developers intended.
32.
by boolemancer 3y ago
What preventative measures could they have used?
33.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Doesn't this use case fall squarely in the realm of the exception for the purposes of interoperability?
34.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> [4] "On information and belief, Yuzu users have (1) dumped Nintendo games they have lawfully purchased and copied the game ROMs into Yuzu; and (2) obtained Nintendo games online from pirate websites and copied those game ROMs into
35.
by boolemancer 3y ago
I'm not sure why you're bringing circumcision into this.
36.
by boolemancer 3y ago
How does opening up the walled garden impact you if you never side load anything?
37.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> If it actually looks different, then it becomes a different code point. Which language gets the original code point and which one needs to change? And what happens to all of the existing text written with the original code point?
38.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Personally I like variable names better than symbols anyway.
39.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> P.S. Having multiple Unicode values that exhibit identically when displayed are a huge veer-into-the-ditch mistake. I.e. the notion that code points should have semantic value is simply wrong. Should a cyrillic `а` and a latin `a` have
40.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Seems to me that if you're introducing something that seems like a bug on purpose, you should probably have the comment in the code explaining why it's there.
41.
by boolemancer 3y ago
There exist free apps that Apple doesn't approve of in it's store. And there are also free apps that might want to be distributed through Apple's store alongside an alternative store, which would require them to accept the ne
42.
by boolemancer 3y ago
As long as Apple can prove that the specific third party app caused whatever damage the warranty was supposed to be covering, sure.
43.
by boolemancer 3y ago
My impression was the the Spirit mentioned in the comment was Spirit AeroSystems, not Spirit Airlines, so the relationship between the two companies is the other way around; Boeing is the customer.
44.
by boolemancer 3y ago
I assume the radio technology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoRa
45.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Any explicit license would only apply to copyrights, including all of the ones you listed there. Buying a painting is not copying it, neither is looking at it, so it wouldn't matter if I had a license for it or not. The fact is that co
46.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> Generative AI, however, can ONLY learn via the theft of copyrighted works. That's not true at all. Any works in the public domain are not copyrighted, and there are things that are not copyrightable, like lists of facts and recipe
47.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Copyright is there to allow you to stop other people from copying your work, but it doesn't give you control over anything else that they might do with it. If I buy your painting, you can stop me from making copies and selling them to
48.
by boolemancer 3y ago
That's not a fair statement to make. It can influence a judge's decision on whether something is fair use, but it can still be fair use even if you profit from it.
49.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> Its not like looking and getting inspiration, its looking and being able to almost perfectly duplicate the style. You cannot copyright a style. A person is perfectly within their right to copy your art style when they produce their own
50.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> It took them years to learn how to code well. All that effort should be contributed to the world for free. I mean, there is a plethora of open source work that is actually contributed to the world for free, right?
51.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Why would you feel that anybody was personally scolding you by saying "black lives matter" if you already believed that black lives matter? Clearly, plenty of people, through both their actions and their words, have made it very c
52.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> Money is a proxy for user value and it is in Amazon's best interest for the customer to continually act upon these recommendations. If Amazon fails to deliver user value customers will be less willing to continue paying. You'
53.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> no, my argument is that the tool being run by midjourney makes them liable for how it is operation. because it's their model, their program, their computer. They are responsible at every level. I still don't see how this woul
54.
by boolemancer 3y ago
That's the thing about the public domain; it belongs to the public, not to any one company. I doubt you have any problem with people profiting off of Shakespeare, Mozart or fairy tales, so what is different about Mickey Mouse? How many
55.
by boolemancer 3y ago
> > If he’s mad at that wait till he sees what the cp command does! > > in order for that analogy to even remotely be applicable, midjourney would have to be a program you run on your own computer and not a service running on mi
56.
by boolemancer 3y ago
There is a good video[1] from the Computerphile channel describing the concept in the context of JPEG. [1] https://youtu.be/Q2aEzeMDHMA
57.
by boolemancer 3y ago
I think it's hard to call it misreporting when they've been reporting it the same way since before the standard you'd rather they use existed.
58.
by boolemancer 3y ago
That's a change from what they said before for one, but there's also no real way to accurately measure "installs" anyway at a technical level.
59.
by boolemancer 3y ago
Fair enough, I wasn't familiar with that feature. Seems like introducing unnecessary overhead to me, but I'm also sure there's a reason it exists, so...
60.
by boolemancer 3y ago
I wouldn't expect Docker to be listening on anything. Docker isn't proxying any traffic into the container, it's just configuring how ports are forwarded from the host to the container.

More ›