Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
blueben
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Saying "that kind of post isn't appropriate here" and "you aren't funny" isn't civil? Really?
62.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
1. If you're going to show off your datacenter, at least put the embarrassing portable fans away. No need to tell the world that your cooling is insufficient. 2. Google translate, you say?
63.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
If you're looking for a place to make snarky comments and congratulate yourself on what a hilarious Internet comedian you are, go to Slashdot or Digg. That kind of pointless babble isn't supposed to be encouraged here. PS. Don't act so offe
64.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Either you are feigning ignorance or you haven't been reading the news for a while. Politicians aren't just exercising free speech. They're exercising political influence to impose censorship, a blatant run-around of first amendment rights.
65.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Benefits as shown by whom? If readers are still expected to do their own research, then what purpose does this grossly oversimplified list serve?
66.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
If you've been following the Wikileaks story, then you've seen the essays by Assange about what Wikileaks wants. It's very simple. A conspiracy needs communication to be effective; if you disable it's ability to communicate, it becomes less
67.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
This must be why they went to bat to defend a book about Pedophilia, specifically citing first amendment rights. Edit: Not sure why this is being voted down. If you argue that Amazon is only acting in their best interests, pointing out that
68.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
You mentioned trade secrets, contracts, and then did some hand waving about national security and state secrets. The former two are irrelevant, and the latter two don't appear to be "content rights" as defined by the law. So my question sti
69.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Everydns explains on their website: "EveryDNS.net provided domain name system (DNS) services to the wikileaks.org domain name until 10PM EST, December 2, 2010, when such services were terminated. As with other users of the EveryDNS.net netw
70.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Feel free to point out which rights to the content that Amazon believes Wikileaks does not have.
71.
▲
Wikileaks is down again, this time through DNS
(twitter.com)
8 points
by
blueben
16y ago
|
4 comments
72.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Amazon has lawyers, and at least some of those lawyers must be experts in the subject of copyright. It is not credible that Amazon was unaware that Government documents are not eligible for copyright. Instead, this response appears to be an
73.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Section 105 of the Copyright Act "Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government, but the United States Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it
74.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
It's not business as usual, which is why it's a big deal. Comcast is trying to do something new. They used to get a cut of revenue from Netflix traffic because it was on Akamai, who pay to sit in Comcast's datacenters. Now that traffic is g
75.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
A third party who Comcast would charge to accept their traffic. Let's be honst here; wherever Netflix goes, Comcast is going to chase after them demanding money to handle their traffic.
76.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Am I to take from this that journalism is a higher calling that requires a self-less attitude and a humble ego? Because I'm pretty sure that kind of journalism has never existed. Regardless of whether Wikileaks is self-aggrandizing or not (
77.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
I'm resisting the urge to simply mock you here. What you are suggesting is technically infeasible, and does not address the issue in any manner of significance. Congratulations, you liberated a few million IPs and delayed the IPv6 migration
78.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
I'd love to hear somebody say they don't take Steve Jobs or Larry Ellison seriously because they're too "self aggrandizing". What happened to results mattering most? There are a lot of reasons to dismiss people and organizations, but how eg
79.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Best handled by diplomats? Because us unwashed masses can't handle the truth, public debate just second-guesses those who are in charge, and we should really leave the important things to the ruling class?
80.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
You've missed the greatest feature of all, though to be fair so did everyone else. Google TV isn't just a device; it's a application platform. The world changed when phones gained applications; why is everyone so myopic about the changes th
81.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Once upon a time, useless comments like the parent and this would be downvoted.
82.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
If you're really serious about building a better Google Health, why not apply at Google and try to actually build a better Google Health?
83.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Oh? How many other social networking sites do your mother or cousin or friends spend their time on? If you blocked Myspace and Facebook on your corporate network, which one would people pitch a fit about losing?
84.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
This is interesting. One might also assume an increase in autism rates among babies developing in the womb during winter months and babies developing in northern climates. Is this true? Do spring and summer babies have a higher rate of auti
85.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Vitamin D is vital to dozens of critical processes in the body. Vitamin D deficiency can lead to developing rickets and bone loss. Studies have linked lower winter-time levels of Vitamin D with proliferation of influenza. Studies also sugge
86.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
What's really amazing is that people seem to believe that Google designed products that were actually manufactured and designed by Sony and Logitech.
87.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
"The senz° umbrella has been awarded all major design awards in the world." We have all your awards. If you want them back, you will have to pay us one MILLION dollars! But seriously, what a strange thing to put in your marketing. Surely yo
88.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
You think Facebook wouldn't fire an employee who leaked confidential internal company information?
89.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
Just because you are jaded and have given up on loyalty and the idea of responsible corporations that care for their employees doesn't mean the rest of us must do so as well. You paint a very black and white picture. Either the world can ha
90.
▲
by
blueben
16y ago
What is evil about checking corporate mail for corporate mail leaks?
More ›