3 ms·
This must be why they went to bat to defend a book about Pedophilia, specifically citing first amendment rights. Edit: Not sure why this is being voted down. I
by blueben 16y ago
This must be why they went to bat to defend a book about Pedophilia, specifically citing first amendment rights.
Edit: Not sure why this is being voted down. If you argue that Amazon is only acting in their best interests, pointing out that their behavior is wildly inconsistent is valid.
- neworbit 16y agoBut then they pulled that book too, right? I thought that result also ended up as censorship.