blharr

17 ms·

271.
by blharr 3y ago
Wow, what a website as well. It literally takes 20 seconds to load the homepage for me. And then the background randomly changing color as you scroll? I'm not terribly picky with design, and I get that its more of a design demo, but it
272.
by blharr 3y ago
Maybe this is a dumb question, but looking at GWP figures, it seems like there's nothing listed that's below CO2. Are there really no hypothetical gases to put in the air that is better than CO2 for global warming?
273.
by blharr 3y ago
Yeah, at first I was a little disappointed as well when I realized it wasn't "actually" using the bacteria. But given the amount of publicity this has gotten, it is probably not too long until someone with the actual hardware
274.
by blharr 3y ago
Clearly, yes. What I mean in relation to the post is that it's hard to even make a question that ChatGPT will fail destructively without doing a lot of research in advance. In many cases, even if it fails, it'll have a reasonable
275.
by blharr 3y ago
They are fairly common, but there is something to it. I've recognized a lot of these turns of phrases unconsciously, noting that it sounds like AI, but not being able to put my finger on why. It's like ChatGPT uses these more unco
276.
by blharr 3y ago
AP Physics C is also one of the more heavily curved exams, where a 55-60% is a 5.
277.
by blharr 3y ago
Yea, it's always been possible to cheat. Also through searching Google. Its just now, you can use ChatGPT, and it's a lot easier for someone to do so.
278.
by blharr 3y ago
The problem is its difficult to track what ChatGPT can and can't do. One day it'll give you junk and then an update or different prompt might fix that problem.
279.
by blharr 3y ago
The idea that spotting cheating is obvious is a case of selection bias. You only notice when it's obvious. Clearly, the person put 0 effort towards cheating (as most cheaters would, to be fair). But slightly adjusting the prompt, or ju
280.
by blharr 3y ago
Ironic that GPT is the most advanced autocomplete ever but they can't do autocomplete in their search
281.
by blharr 3y ago
Per person, China India and Russia are still lower in emissions than the US. The people who individually have the most impact and likely ability to reduce their carbon footprint is therefore those in the US.
282.
by blharr 3y ago
Isn't it the opposite? It matters none to the outliers because they're so far above the competition, but it matters at least significantly to the average person. The Indians also spent expertise fletching decent arrows, for that r
283.
by blharr 3y ago
In that case the stalemated player has no moves. So you can't keep playing
284.
by blharr 3y ago
>Yes, patches and trunk! We were still using SVN back then. Is SVN really that obsolete? I thought it was still used
285.
by blharr 3y ago
Can you elaborate more on how Javascript allows for sharing of addon names? I didn't know this and wasn't able to find any references on it.
286.
by blharr 3y ago
That doesn't strike me as passive aggressive at all. It seems like a general rejection but what else could you say?
287.
by blharr 3y ago
Obviously, large data files will need large memory, but aside from that, music and spellcheck take little memory, and web browsing takes so much For 90% of browsing like searching and reading articles or watching video or using email, all o
288.
by blharr 3y ago
That requires a gravity based mechanism to return it back down though.
289.
by blharr 3y ago
That requires a gravity based mechanism to return it back down though.
290.
by blharr 3y ago
It seems like not all columns are the same. For example I couldn't get an apple in the middle column
291.
by blharr 3y ago
I'd love to see twos complement representation added
292.
by blharr 3y ago
It likely could be, not to mention the prompt includes "Do not mention the authors names" which probably makes it thinks you are trying to plagiarize
293.
by blharr 3y ago
I'm a little surprised by the lack of the solution or deeper analysis. It seems like there are some hints towards figuring out the problem. To more closely confirm the actual reason, the easiest bet would be to prompt further on reject
294.
by blharr 3y ago
The same publisher for both books
295.
by blharr 3y ago
Isn't O(1) an oversimplification? In comparison wouldn't electrical computers then also be able to simulate all electrical effects in O(1) Time?
296.
by blharr 3y ago
Reinforcement learning
297.
by blharr 3y ago
I don't think electronic interference is the problem. Cellphone towers and electronics operate at GHz and MHz, which are different frequencies than brainwaves. Interference seems to typically be labeled by a "Signal to Interferenc
298.
by blharr 3y ago
They're great demos, but the tasks are not really at the scale of larger projects and codebases.
299.
by blharr 3y ago
GPT4 is already well above the level of reliability and accuracy of any of my high school teachers.
300.
by blharr 3y ago
For me it is amazingly slow how time seems to pass at 1, 2, 3, 4 AM versus 9-12 PM I've never really thought about why that is, but just the relative difference between the numbers may be part of it

More ›