blharr

17 ms·

301.
by blharr 3y ago
My speculation would be that this might work even better, as positive reinforcement typically works better
302.
by blharr 3y ago
Discord calls are great, but the chat UX is awful in my experience. I'm curious, what do you like about it?
303.
by blharr 3y ago
This can be done pretty easily with their api if you are willing to spend some time on it
304.
by blharr 3y ago
I bought a couple of 64x64 LED Matrix displays and used an ESP32 to control the display of images on it. It now makes a cool feature in my room https://github.com/bradleeharr/Image-Display-LED-Matrix https:/&#x2F
305.
by blharr 3y ago
Though IG has a strong recommendation algorithm. If a user stops interacting with AI generated posts, it will stop recommending them. So you could be in a recommendation algorithm world with 0 AI generated content if you were able to discri
306.
by blharr 3y ago
If you are basing off the names, it could just as well be a play on the perfect market price in economics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterisk#:~:text=In%20econom... ).
307.
by blharr 3y ago
The star in A* doesn't have anything to do with the algorithm itself. It just means optimal. Q star would mean optimal Q. If that is even what the star is referring to. There is still no way to know if the Q is the quality factor, qu
308.
by blharr 3y ago
There is virtually zero chance that this is what Q* is. Loosely connecting the fact that both are named with a letter and an asterisk is the only basis there is for thinking this.
309.
by blharr 3y ago
This is just speculation, but I wonder if the naming behind both Q related things is why they became so popular. I could not imagine the same amount of searches and guesswork had they called it "P*" instead. It seems like Q inhere
310.
by blharr 3y ago
It seems like people are really stretching here. Q-learning has been a thing for a while now. And in optimization of X , Q , etc. the star is just used to mean the optimal value.
311.
by blharr 3y ago
This is a reasonable response. There was ambiguity in you addressing it directly versus its internal name not being copilot. It clarifies and attempts to give an answer anyways
312.
by blharr 3y ago
50 per 3 hours isn't so bad when I am using it. Writing a prompt + the response takes a minute, then it takes a couple minutes on average to go over the response and only then do I end up asking again. In using it I've only ended
313.
by blharr 3y ago
It still is, and I run into it sometimes but only when using it repeatedly
314.
by blharr 3y ago
The content is fine. That's probably because they copied the exact story from yahoo's article. If you take a look the writing, quotes used and phrasing is nearly the exact same. They just reworded things.
315.
by blharr 3y ago
I didn't notice the site itself, but it does have some very odd and poor writing in this article. Like this wordy sentence: >The U.S. Department of Justice has now reportedly contacted Kristy Althaus, who recently filed a lawsuit ag
316.
by blharr 3y ago
Because in my experience GPT can produce a maximum of like 200 lines of code before it makes an error usually.
317.
by blharr 3y ago
Here's an example recreation. https://chat.openai.com/share/b80aa985-0d88-4cf3-8c87-c2047f... I admittedly give it a vague question "where the signals overlap" In context of the original thing I was tryi
318.
by blharr 3y ago
According to them, "We do not train on your data from ChatGPT Enterprise or our API Platform" https://openai.com/enterprise-privacy Though I'm not sure if this covers other analysis of the data, or if it&#x27
319.
by blharr 3y ago
Please, please, reference the tasks or chats that were especially impressive. For example, trying to get chat gpt to do something very simple for my work, like implementing a convolution it took me in circles and circles. It gets the genera
320.
by blharr 3y ago
You are probably on the demographic not to get suckered in the first place
321.
by blharr 3y ago
In this case, the car is the internet itself. Every form of social media is an open window for groomers and filled with abuse. You just don't see it as openly, and it's often relegated to DMs. But Instagram, X, Snapchat, Discord,
322.
by blharr 3y ago
I feel like this argument only holds weakly. By providing "numbers" you think you are providing objective points, but how to weigh incidents solved vs service vs other metrics is still purely subjective. Ultimately what you are do
323.
by blharr 3y ago
What is up with them releasing big new features and not even posting about them? Like adding image generation, and things like the advanced data analysis were barely announced. This pdf feature seems very useful, but there's no instruc
324.
by blharr 3y ago
I was very excited when this came out. The idea of "search this textbook and describe ..." or "search through this paper and implement X algorithm" sounded really interesting. Admittedly, I don't know how the implem
325.
by blharr 3y ago
Even crabs: https://www.technologyreview.com/2012/04/12/186779/computer-...
326.
by blharr 3y ago
For 4. Overall, the goals are similar. Both are trying to optimize over the game to try and reach a winning state. But the methods are different. The Deep Blue algorithm just does a search over the tree of possible moves (up to a certain
327.
by blharr 3y ago
I doubt they would want to be judged on code they wrote 10 years ago, though.
328.
by blharr 3y ago
I doubt they would want to be judged on code they wrote 10 years ago, though
329.
by blharr 3y ago
To further top it off, she didn't just do well, she fully won the competition that season. She also makes some great youtube videos about cooking and other things https://youtube.com/@theblindcook
330.
by blharr 3y ago
The growing fat and sedentary people 2 decades ago are getting older. And/or the extent of it is getting worse. I know after covid lockdowns I became much more used to days where I would stay at home all day and sit at my computer work

More ›