blah5432

3 ms·

1.
by blah5432 10y ago
You need to assume nothing. Your government is spying on everybody without an ID. Your explanation just doesn't qualify, sorry.
2.
by blah5432 10y ago
The "detail" is so vague as to not deserve that name. Give me a ten minutes description of the described environment and I will give you a dozen alternative explanation to the especulation presented in the article. This is no more
3.
by blah5432 10y ago
Because this lovely customer I'm working in MITMs the HTTPS. You know, it's so cool to read gmail on the phone. BTW, shame on Chrome for allowing it without a warning :-/ Firefox totally refused to connect.
4.
by blah5432 10y ago
all the electricity burned to make bitcoins is a crime against the planet Actually I'm happy to have a chance to say this: Fuck the planet.
5.
by blah5432 10y ago
Resistance to ID is just an americanism. There are no practical negative consecuences and a lot of good ones. Identity is a right that government must warrant, not something dirty that should be buried.
6.
by blah5432 10y ago
Is it unimaginable that this might be uncomfortable? Is is unimaginable that this might not? Maybe because it was made respectfully and in a friendly manner? Could the fact that the person telling it didn't mention any rejection mean
7.
by blah5432 10y ago
This is a blame game. It's tried on individuals. When they reject accusations, there's the "you are biased even if you don't realize" and then the "you are a tool in the hands of an oppressing society". If
8.
by blah5432 10y ago
diversity (or lack of it) of the field is a result of the shift in targeting a certain type of person for the programmer's job Based on... which facts exactly? Edit: As far as I can see, the picture is that there's a bunch of so