birjolaxew

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by birjolaxew 10mo ago

   Wouldn't it be more along the lines of "source available" being a public park that you're free to access but can't monetize by e.g. selling tickets to - while "open source" would let you do whatever you wa
2. 2.▲
   by birjolaxew 2y ago

   > This would allow you to avoid displaying the cookie banner. That isn't actually true (or at least is only allowed in the "it's a small enough violation of the law that the enforcers have bigger fish to fry" sense).
3. 3.▲
   by birjolaxew 2y ago

   I've actually had this discussion with Plausible directly back in 2022[1], and more recently with the lawyer they had write a blog post[2] on the topic. I wrote an article on it, that was recently discussed here on HN [3]. The response
4. 4.▲
   by birjolaxew 2y ago

   You left out the context of your quote[0], where the Working Party explicitly states that first party analytics are not exempt from Article 5.3. Your quote leads up to their opinion that they _wish_ it was exempt, since it represents little
5. 5.▲
   Do cookie-free analytics need cookie banners?(jfagerberg.me)

   63 points by birjolaxew 2y ago|85 comments