bifrost

9 ms·

91.
by bifrost 3y ago
It'll be no bikes worth of parking when the thieves find out where this is.
92.
by bifrost 3y ago
Fixing the train won't cut it. Everyone who lives there will need to drive.
93.
by bifrost 3y ago
This is also right on point. Although the sewage plant is not exactly right next to it lol.
94.
by bifrost 3y ago
Dogpatch is well situated for commuting, as is a fair amount of SOMA. The SFBOS is looking to change that because they want to take down the 280 connector that gets people in and out of SF quickly. WFH is slowly going away so I wouldn'
95.
by bifrost 3y ago
People who live here, and I mean actually live here, not ones that just pop in for a few years and decide it needs to change. YIMBYism is very misguided in SF.
96.
by bifrost 3y ago
Exactly. They should take their YIMBYism somewhere else. Maybe like Oakland. Oakland is permitting more buildings than SF but the problem is that Oakland has a huge crime and governance issue, even worse than SF.
97.
by bifrost 3y ago
No, there is no market for this. And even if there was it'd be hamstrung by the lack of infrastructure (roads/parking) so it'd be a nightmare to live there.
98.
by bifrost 3y ago
100% Vacancy is at an all time high right now, people are leaving my hometown because of our horrendous government.
99.
by bifrost 3y ago
They're not screwing their children lol. Homelessness in SF is about drugs, not housing, its very clear.
100.
by bifrost 3y ago
This is a terrible idea. The SF YIMBY movement is completely out of touch with the spirit of SF. I say this as a native San Franciscan.
101.
Ella in Amsterdam: A VC Journey(ellainamsterdam.substack.com)
1 points by bifrost 4y ago|0 comments
102.
by bifrost 4y ago
Sorry, that requirement is illegal.
103.
by bifrost 4y ago
Money has very little to do with people excercising their civil rights.
104.
by bifrost 4y ago
Not really. They'll just find another way. There are also a lot of people who believe people have the right to end their own lives.
105.
by bifrost 4y ago
You cannot gate a right with a requirement to be in a militia. Even if you could, you only need one person to be a militia. The government looking through your personal information requires due process, otherwise its a violation of the 4th
106.
by bifrost 4y ago
Yes, 5 people were killed and 3 injured by a psychopath with a knife. Violent dangerous people find a way. The scale is irrelevant to the actual problem.
107.
by bifrost 4y ago
What you are suggesting is illegal. Its illegal to license a right. We shouldn't penalize the hundreds of millions of legal gun owners in the US because we're unable to catch psychopaths before they kill people.
108.
by bifrost 4y ago
Thats pretty orthogonal to the issue at hand. There are over 350 million legal gun owners in the US, we're statistically safer than any other country.
109.
by bifrost 4y ago
Its because buying a gun is a civil right. Smoking is not. That said, the 21yo requirement may be unconstitutional as well.
110.
by bifrost 4y ago
If we're going to talk numbers - most gun deaths involve gang/drug activities. The real numbers once you remove suicide and gangs all point to mental illness and DV/Violent individuals.
111.
by bifrost 4y ago
Or we could take the spate of teenage psychopathic murderers and develop a plan to combat it sanely.
112.
by bifrost 4y ago
It'd have to be threat of violence.
113.
by bifrost 4y ago
The age restriction is illegal, just ruled on by CA Supreme Court. Social Media activity check is a violation of the 4th amendment. You can't tax or gate a right by requiring someone to join a militia.
114.
by bifrost 4y ago
No, I'm saying their cultures do not tolerate abberation and violence.
115.
by bifrost 4y ago
There was a mass stabbing in Norway last week, so thats pretty accurate. Waiting periods are never effective for anything aside from suicide, and they may technically be unconstitutional, that is being fought in the courts right now. NICS c
116.
by bifrost 4y ago
Its true. Texas had a plan in to spruce up school safety, they just didn't go forward with it, its pretty sad. I read through it, it looked like it would be very effective. Luckily first responders neutralized the shooter otherwise mor
117.
by bifrost 4y ago
Beto is right and wrong at the same time. This psycho kid had red flags everywhere and there was no real mechanism in place to close the loop.
118.
by bifrost 4y ago
It likely will for a variety of reasons. People will make up all kinds of reasons why "this doesn't happen anywhere else", they'll completely ignore the actual cause of the violence (a person), they'll make excuses,
119.
by bifrost 4y ago
He's not wrong.
120.
by bifrost 4y ago
Thats basically exactly whats happening. Its a travesty. SF enacted massive taxes to basically do this and it does nothing but waste money and drive businesses out of San Francisco. https://twitter.com/paulg/status&#x2F

More ›