berryjerry

9 ms·

31.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I'm talking about the intent behind cutting off communication was the same in both instances. The intent is to eliminate the ability for people to organize. You do that literally removing every post that includes a mention of election
32.
by berryjerry 6y ago
According to Russia these guys are rioters and mobs and so cutting off internet is justified. It is reported in English news as 'protesters' getting their communication cut off. However, about two weeks ago the US president himsel
33.
by berryjerry 6y ago
Parler was killed for one reason. They said they wouldn't ban Trump. It's probably tamer than Facebook, Twitter or even Reddit where one search and you can find threats and calls for violence.
34.
by berryjerry 6y ago
For me it takes less than 2 seconds to start up fully. Not sure what is wrong with you guy's computers. Maybe you need an SSD or more RAM.
35.
by berryjerry 6y ago
You still cannot threaten physical violence. This imaginary prospect that 'free speech' includes threats is stupid. And of course any individual still can block you. It is literally the same as Twitter.
36.
by berryjerry 6y ago
No, everyone thinks they could do a better job but no one actually wants those jobs.
37.
by berryjerry 6y ago
It still doesn't work. It's sad but even payment processors are able to make editorial decisions on who can accept payments. You can control all your content and still be at the mercy of payment processors, ISP, domain hosts, and
38.
by berryjerry 6y ago
Exactly. Here's another comparison. Why should cities build affordable housing? People can just go move into the forests and mountains and build houses themselves. The point is that these entities have become a necessity for doing busi
39.
by berryjerry 6y ago
This is dead on correct. The problem is online most people don't have to hear what you say, they can just not subscribe or not follow you and never hear a word of what you said. This is why over-moderation on the big tech sites like Re
40.
by berryjerry 6y ago
People get more conservative as they get older because they realize things cost money, how hard they have to work to earn it, and how bad the government is at spending it for them. I'd say modern day conservativism is more akin to indi
41.
by berryjerry 6y ago
From a doctor I've heard you only need to go in the sun for about 10 minutes a day and you'll get all the vitamin D you need, but food also gives you it.
42.
by berryjerry 6y ago
Precisely. Black is no more important than a descriptor than say eye color or hair color in relation to covid. The reality is black population in the US are more obese than the white population, which is a major comorbidity, hence the highe
43.
by berryjerry 6y ago
The problem is people see anything against democrats as 'Trump propaganda.' It may be hard to believe but everyone on either side isn't all gumdrops and kisses. There is so much evidence that the laptop is real, nude photos,
44.
by berryjerry 6y ago
They refuse to engage with him. "Our intention in sending the memo was for you to revise the story for publication. However, it's clear from your response this morning that you are unwilling to engage in a productive editorial pro
45.
by berryjerry 6y ago
yea it's a '3 second handheld exposure' like are you kidding, in a camera review?
46.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I think it's a great idea to have a camera that is also a phone, rather than the other way around. I wouldn't care if it was an inch thick instead of a quarter inch if it had the actual best camera built in.
47.
by berryjerry 6y ago
That photo is insta-delete in my book at any resolution. I think it's just a bad scene all together but also nothing is sharp at any distance from the camera and colors look washed.
48.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I don't think you are understanding or respecting their argument. Population is not a relevant factor. Violent crime is the relevant factor. The amount of violent crime committed by members of a group is what correlates to higher shoot
49.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I don't see consistency in logic. If the hairstyles were not accepted then 'wealthy white women' wouldn't be celebrated/complimented for adopting them. If anything having them become more celebrated by all would hav
50.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I think this is regulatory. I have seen multiple articles like the attached which have caused Tesla to basically handicap it's own autopilot. As another said I have no idea how a company with a car is not ahead of a company without one
51.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I'd like to see some actual data. This link has not a single number to back up it's claims. It feels like a politician saying "the data and science is on our side" yet never providing any data, studies or science, someth
52.
by berryjerry 6y ago
There is still no treatment. THe people I know who were positive literally received absolutely no medication and were told to just stay home for 14 days despite having a fever and cough. They don't even consider it worthy of any medica
53.
by berryjerry 6y ago
A massive jump in RTX performance.. which no one actually uses. They didn't even show regular performance comparison.
54.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I find it nuts that those streamers called the game "smooth as butter" at 60 fps. Even if it was 8K, there is no way 60 fps could feel smooth.
55.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I thought only the RTX was twice as fast, which no one really uses still.
56.
by berryjerry 6y ago
How is that aggressive pricing? Those are the same prices they have used for previous generations.
57.
by berryjerry 6y ago
Yes, I'm sure they were just cementing the doors as a practical joke, not planning to set it on fire as they are doing across the country. /s
58.
by berryjerry 6y ago
Don't know what QAnon was, apparently it's not just one person but 7K accounts so a group? I took one visit to the website not long ago and wrote it off as garbage. Obviously there is true stuff mixed in but I'd say the fake
59.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I think it is a false dilemma to assume that either person would become rich by means of owning the land at that time. The second the land was stolen it's future was changed forever but that does not change the original value of the st
60.
by berryjerry 6y ago
I understand the point, because one was born with more, one owes it to those born with less. Correct? I think that is an economical system argument than a moral argument. I don't find being born into ANY situation a reason to feel guil

More ›