Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bdr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
71 ms
·
751.
▲
by
bdr
16y ago
Meh. What are the advantages over daemontools?
752.
▲
by
bdr
16y ago
Bingo.
753.
▲
by
bdr
16y ago
Wow, talk about a sampling bias.
754.
▲
by
bdr
16y ago
There was a great comment here on a previous thread, but I can't find it. Anyone know what I'm talking about?
755.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Should read "If we have some table ".
756.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Some more thought (can't edit below due to noprocrast :). As he suggests at the end, the distance between points (cards) on the table seems to be important. If we have some set with a given mean distance between point (or some better measur
757.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
There's a factor he doesn't mention, which is which set is removed from the table. Norvig's code removes the first set it finds. Another strategy would be to identity all sets and remove one at random. And who knows how humans play? It's
758.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
You aren't thinking of Oppenheimer?
759.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
What if he'd just been an ordinary guy? I think the damage to his life and the lives of those who knew him is more important than what he would have invented.
760.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
You're putting us all down. Blogging is no more inherently self-important than speaking at all.
761.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Wiser than the author? Where do you get that from? Also, while I agree that the piece is more philosophical than literary, it's more than just an argument for the younger man's perspective. After all, if the argument were irrefutable, the b
762.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
"if you're the kind of person who likes to use self-important HR jargon" Wow, talk about self-important. People have a term for something you just took a paragraph to explain. Can you guess why? This comes across as a pointless dig to make
763.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Not distasteful, but lacking information. People around here are very sensitive about the signal to noise ratio. (FWIW, I didn't downvote you.) This latest post has a little more effort put into it, and I think it probably would have fared
764.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Here's something I've been thinking about. Imagine Google or FB acquires of a small startup. The startup's product is either unwanted or incorporated into their parent company within a year. That means that for the next couple years of the
765.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Still, your post was essentially "CS is overpriced", but more verbose. If you have some analysis of their pricing (and why it might be wrong), share it, but to just state your personal opinion like that is kind of pointless.
766.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
It seems like you're saying CS is overpriced, but it's not clear how that's relevant.
767.
▲
Terence Tao on the relationship between classical and Bayesian reasoning
(google.com)
81 points
by
bdr
17y ago
|
12 comments
768.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Maybe successful financially, but too slow for me to use.
769.
▲
Take It to the Limit
(opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com)
8 points
by
bdr
17y ago
|
0 comments
770.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Well, I'm glad someone appreciates it.
771.
▲
Mathematical April Fool Results
(rjlipton.wordpress.com)
1 points
by
bdr
17y ago
|
0 comments
772.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
I address your safety concerns in the README. But seriously, how would you have designed this more Pythonically? It's an easy criticism to make, so back it up!
773.
▲
Show HN: autolib, the last Python library you'll ever need
(github.com)
13 points
by
bdr
17y ago
|
7 comments
774.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Terry Tao is on it! http://mathoverflow.net/questions/9731/polynomial-representi...
775.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
It's striking how they don't use an article before the word "iPad". For example, they say "reading on iPad" instead of "reading on the iPad". Are they trying to make it sound alive?
776.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
There are two different definitions of "know" in play. That's all it is.
777.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Better than what Bill Gates called the iPod: a hard-drive with a headphone jack.
778.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
Do you know whether the restrictions you're talking about limit regexps to the set of actual regular languages?
779.
▲
by
bdr
17y ago
According to http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=ox -- "Oxen is the only true survival in Mod.Eng. of the O.E. weak plural." From what I can tell, it looks like OE nouns could have either "strong" or "weak" declensions, and this is d
780.
▲
Finding Your Roots
(opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com)
10 points
by
bdr
17y ago
|
0 comments
More ›